Demographics details for Logan, OH vs Bethlehem, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Logan, OH vs Bethlehem, PA.
Data | Logan | Bethlehem |
---|---|---|
Population | 46,040 | 77,617 |
Median Age | 41.8 years | 35.9 years |
Median Income | $69,125 | $62,072 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Logan vs Bethlehem
- The population in Bethlehem is higher at 77,617, compared to 46,040 in Logan.
- Residents in Logan have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 35.9 years in Bethlehem.
- Logan has a higher median income of $69,125 compared to $62,072 in Bethlehem.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Logan at 47.0% compared to 29.0% in Bethlehem.
- The poverty level is higher in Bethlehem at 13%, compared to 9% in Logan.
- The unemployment rate in Logan is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.5% in Bethlehem.
Demographics
Demographics Logan vs Bethlehem provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Logan | Bethlehem |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 9 |
White | 91 | 47 |
Asian | 1 | 3 |
Hispanic | 2 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Logan vs Bethlehem
- In Bethlehem, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 2% in Logan.
- Logan has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 47% in Bethlehem.
- In Bethlehem, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Logan.
- Bethlehem has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 2% in Logan.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bethlehem at 11%, compared to 4% in Logan.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Logan and Bethlehem at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Logan | Bethlehem |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 12.1% |
Depression | 24.6% | 21.8% |
Smoking | 21.1% | 18.4% |
Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 39.9% | 34.7% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Logan vs Bethlehem
- More residents in Logan report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 16.9% in Bethlehem.
- Depression is more prevalent in Logan at 24.6% compared to 21.8% in Bethlehem.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Logan at 21.1% compared to 18.4% in Bethlehem.
- Binge drinking is more common in Logan at 18.5% compared to 17.6% in Bethlehem.
- Obesity rates are higher in Logan at 39.9% compared to 34.7% in Bethlehem.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Logan and Bethlehem at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Logan | Bethlehem |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (204) | 0.6% (452) |
High School Diploma | 27.1% (12,459) | 16.9% (13,125) |
Less than High School | 9.5% (4,365) | 12.9% (10,045) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.1% (6,040) | 22.0% (17,044) |
Education Levels Comparison: Logan vs Bethlehem
- In Bethlehem, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Logan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Logan hold a high school diploma at 27.1% compared to 16.9% in Bethlehem.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bethlehem at 12.9%, compared to 9.5% in Logan.
- In Bethlehem, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 13.1% in Logan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.