Demographics details for Livermore, IA vs Freeport, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Livermore, IA vs Freeport, IL.
| Data | Livermore | Freeport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 377 | 23,413 |
| Median Age | 26.5 years | 43.4 years |
| Median Income | $74,167 | $44,658 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.9 |
Population Comparison: Livermore vs Freeport
- The population in Freeport is higher at 23,413, compared to 377 in Livermore.
- The median age in Freeport is higher at 43.4 years, compared to 26.5 years in Livermore.
- Livermore has a higher median income of $74,167 compared to $44,658 in Freeport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Livermore at 51.0% compared to 35.0% in Freeport.
- Livermore has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 0% in Freeport.
- Freeport has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 3.5% in Livermore.
Demographics
Demographics Livermore vs Freeport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Livermore | Freeport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 14 |
| White | 85 | 68 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Livermore vs Freeport
- In Freeport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 2% in Livermore.
- Livermore has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 68% in Freeport.
- In Freeport, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Livermore.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Livermore at 10% compared to 6% in Freeport.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Freeport at 10%, compared to 3% in Livermore.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Livermore and Freeport at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Livermore | Freeport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 19.5% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 19.1% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.7% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 37.9% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Livermore vs Freeport
- In Freeport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.2% in Livermore.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Freeport at 22.3% versus 19.5% in Livermore.
- Freeport has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 19.1% in Livermore.
- Binge drinking is more common in Livermore at 21.7% compared to 15.9% in Freeport.
- Freeport has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 37.9% in Livermore.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Freeport at 20.0% compared to 18.0% in Livermore.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Livermore | Freeport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (1) | 0.9% (206) |
| High School Diploma | 23.6% (89) | 19.8% (4,646) |
| Less than High School | 8.5% (32) | 12.2% (2,845) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.2% (16) | 12.9% (3,011) |
Education Levels Comparison: Livermore vs Freeport
- In Freeport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.3% in Livermore.
- A higher percentage of residents in Livermore hold a high school diploma at 23.6% compared to 19.8% in Freeport.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Freeport at 12.2%, compared to 8.5% in Livermore.
- In Freeport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.9% compared to 4.2% in Livermore.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.