Demographics details for Little falls, MN vs Mcminnville, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Little falls, MN vs Mcminnville, OR.

Data Little falls Mcminnville
Population 9,094 34,530
Median Age 40.8 years 40.1 years
Median Income $44,455 $65,318
Married Families 34.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 11% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.9

Population Comparison: Little falls vs Mcminnville

  • The population in Mcminnville is higher at 34,530, compared to 9,094 in Little falls.
  • Residents in Little falls have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 40.1 years in Mcminnville.
  • Mcminnville has a higher median income of $65,318, compared to $44,455 in Little falls.
  • In Mcminnville, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 34.0% in Little falls.
  • Little falls has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Mcminnville.
  • The unemployment rate in Little falls is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.9% in Mcminnville.

Demographics

Demographics Little falls vs Mcminnville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Little falls Mcminnville
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 95 67
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 1 18
Two or More Races 3 12
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Little falls vs Mcminnville

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Little falls and Mcminnville at 0%.
  • Little falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 67% in Mcminnville.
  • In Mcminnville, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Little falls.
  • Mcminnville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 1% in Little falls.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mcminnville at 12%, compared to 3% in Little falls.
  • In Mcminnville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Little falls.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Little falls Mcminnville
Mental Health Not Good 16.6% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 11.6%
Depression 25.0% 27.2%
Smoking 22.3% 15.6%
Binge Drinking 20.6% 17.6%
Obesity 38.5% 35.1%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Little falls vs Mcminnville

  • In Mcminnville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.6% in Little falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mcminnville at 27.2% versus 25.0% in Little falls.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Little falls at 22.3% compared to 15.6% in Mcminnville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Little falls at 20.6% compared to 17.6% in Mcminnville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Little falls at 38.5% compared to 35.1% in Mcminnville.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Little falls and Mcminnville at 17.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Little falls Mcminnville
No Schooling 0.7% (63) 1.4% (472)
High School Diploma 25.4% (2,308) 11.9% (4,114)
Less than High School 11.7% (1,063) 16.8% (5,808)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.3% (1,301) 17.7% (6,118)

Education Levels Comparison: Little falls vs Mcminnville

  • In Mcminnville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.7% in Little falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Little falls hold a high school diploma at 25.4% compared to 11.9% in Mcminnville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mcminnville at 16.8%, compared to 11.7% in Little falls.
  • In Mcminnville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 14.3% in Little falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.