Demographics details for Lindenhurst, NY vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lindenhurst, NY vs Gallatin, TN.
Data | Lindenhurst | Gallatin |
---|---|---|
Population | 27,064 | 48,194 |
Median Age | 40.3 years | 37.8 years |
Median Income | $115,967 | $68,548 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Lindenhurst vs Gallatin
- The population in Gallatin is higher at 48,194, compared to 27,064 in Lindenhurst.
- Residents in Lindenhurst have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 37.8 years in Gallatin.
- Lindenhurst has a higher median income of $115,967 compared to $68,548 in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lindenhurst at 43.0% compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
- The poverty level is higher in Gallatin at 13%, compared to 4% in Lindenhurst.
- The unemployment rate in Lindenhurst is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Lindenhurst vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lindenhurst | Gallatin |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 15 |
White | 74 | 67 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 15 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lindenhurst vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 4% in Lindenhurst.
- Lindenhurst has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
- Both Lindenhurst and Gallatin have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lindenhurst at 15% compared to 9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gallatin at 7%, compared to 5% in Lindenhurst.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lindenhurst and Gallatin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lindenhurst | Gallatin |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 13.2% |
Depression | 20.9% | 27.7% |
Smoking | 14.3% | 20.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 14.7% |
Obesity | 29.3% | 37.2% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lindenhurst vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 15.1% in Lindenhurst.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 20.9% in Lindenhurst.
- Gallatin has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 14.3% in Lindenhurst.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lindenhurst at 17.3% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 29.3% in Lindenhurst.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gallatin at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Lindenhurst.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lindenhurst | Gallatin |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (272) | 1.2% (596) |
High School Diploma | 21.0% (5,679) | 13.9% (6,695) |
Less than High School | 10.2% (2,762) | 11.6% (5,600) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (5,745) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lindenhurst vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.0% in Lindenhurst.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lindenhurst hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallatin at 11.6%, compared to 10.2% in Lindenhurst.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lindenhurst hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 19.6% in Gallatin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.