Demographics details for Lexington, NE vs Montezuma, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, NE vs Montezuma, GA.
Data | Lexington | Montezuma |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,725 | 2,958 |
Median Age | 30.0 years | 43.2 years |
Median Income | $63,939 | $46,315 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 26.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Lexington vs Montezuma
- In Lexington, the population is higher at 10,725, compared to 2,958 in Montezuma.
- The median age in Montezuma is higher at 43.2 years, compared to 30.0 years in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher median income of $63,939 compared to $46,315 in Montezuma.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lexington at 35.0% compared to 26.0% in Montezuma.
- The poverty level is higher in Montezuma at 19%, compared to 9% in Lexington.
- Montezuma has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Lexington.
Demographics
Demographics Lexington vs Montezuma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lexington | Montezuma |
---|---|---|
Black | 15 | 79 |
White | 4 | 15 |
Asian | 1 | 3 |
Hispanic | 64 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 1 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Montezuma
- In Montezuma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 79% compared to 15% in Lexington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Montezuma at 15% compared to 4% in Lexington.
- In Montezuma, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Lexington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lexington at 64% compared to 2% in Montezuma.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lexington at 15% compared to 1% in Montezuma.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lexington at 1% compared to 0% in Montezuma.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lexington | Montezuma |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.6% | 19.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 15.7% |
Depression | 16.2% | 19.7% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 23.8% |
Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 11.9% |
Obesity | 45.1% | 44.2% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Montezuma
- In Montezuma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Montezuma at 19.7% versus 16.2% in Lexington.
- Montezuma has a higher smoking rate at 23.8% compared to 18.6% in Lexington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lexington at 18.1% compared to 11.9% in Montezuma.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lexington at 45.1% compared to 44.2% in Montezuma.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Montezuma at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Lexington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lexington | Montezuma |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 6.2% (660) | 0.2% (7) |
High School Diploma | 13.6% (1,463) | 24.9% (737) |
Less than High School | 36.3% (3,892) | 11.3% (335) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (779) | 11.3% (333) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Montezuma
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington have no formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 0.2% in Montezuma.
- In Montezuma, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
- More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 36.3% compared to 11.3% in Montezuma.
- In Montezuma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.3% compared to 7.3% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.