Demographics details for Lexington, NE vs Mcminnville, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lexington, NE vs Mcminnville, OR.
Data | Lexington | Mcminnville |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,725 | 34,530 |
Median Age | 30.0 years | 40.1 years |
Median Income | $63,939 | $65,318 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Lexington vs Mcminnville
- The population in Mcminnville is higher at 34,530, compared to 10,725 in Lexington.
- The median age in Mcminnville is higher at 40.1 years, compared to 30.0 years in Lexington.
- Mcminnville has a higher median income of $65,318, compared to $63,939 in Lexington.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Lexington and Mcminnville at 35.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Mcminnville at 10%, compared to 9% in Lexington.
- Mcminnville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.5% in Lexington.
Demographics
Demographics Lexington vs Mcminnville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lexington | Mcminnville |
---|---|---|
Black | 15 | Data is updating |
White | 4 | 67 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 64 | 18 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 12 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lexington vs Mcminnville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lexington at 15% compared to 0% in Mcminnville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mcminnville at 67% compared to 4% in Lexington.
- In Mcminnville, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Lexington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lexington at 64% compared to 18% in Mcminnville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lexington at 15% compared to 12% in Mcminnville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lexington and Mcminnville at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lexington | Mcminnville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.6% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 11.6% |
Depression | 16.2% | 27.2% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 15.6% |
Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 45.1% | 35.1% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lexington vs Mcminnville
- In Mcminnville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mcminnville at 27.2% versus 16.2% in Lexington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lexington at 18.6% compared to 15.6% in Mcminnville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lexington at 18.1% compared to 17.6% in Mcminnville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lexington at 45.1% compared to 35.1% in Mcminnville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mcminnville at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Lexington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lexington | Mcminnville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 6.2% (660) | 1.4% (472) |
High School Diploma | 13.6% (1,463) | 11.9% (4,114) |
Less than High School | 36.3% (3,892) | 16.8% (5,808) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (779) | 17.7% (6,118) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lexington vs Mcminnville
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington have no formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 1.4% in Mcminnville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lexington hold a high school diploma at 13.6% compared to 11.9% in Mcminnville.
- More residents in Lexington have less than a high school education at 36.3% compared to 16.8% in Mcminnville.
- In Mcminnville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.7% compared to 7.3% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.