Demographics details for Lees summit, MO vs Chino hills, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lees summit, MO vs Chino hills, CA.
Data | Lees summit | Chino hills |
---|---|---|
Population | 103,465 | 77,949 |
Median Age | 38.6 years | 39.4 years |
Median Income | $103,447 | $117,548 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Lees summit vs Chino hills
- In Lees summit, the population is higher at 103,465, compared to 77,949 in Chino hills.
- The median age in Chino hills is higher at 39.4 years, compared to 38.6 years in Lees summit.
- Chino hills has a higher median income of $117,548, compared to $103,447 in Lees summit.
- In Chino hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 45.0% in Lees summit.
- The poverty level is higher in Chino hills at 8%, compared to 5% in Lees summit.
- Chino hills has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.3% in Lees summit.
Demographics
Demographics Lees summit vs Chino hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lees summit | Chino hills |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 4 |
White | 78 | 14 |
Asian | 2 | 40 |
Hispanic | 5 | 29 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lees summit vs Chino hills
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lees summit at 9% compared to 4% in Chino hills.
- Lees summit has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 14% in Chino hills.
- In Chino hills, the Asian population stands at 40%, greater than 2% in Lees summit.
- Chino hills has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 5% in Lees summit.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chino hills at 13%, compared to 6% in Lees summit.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lees summit and Chino hills at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lees summit | Chino hills |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 12.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 8.0% |
Depression | 21.8% | 14.6% |
Smoking | 13.1% | 7.9% |
Binge Drinking | 21.7% | 15.3% |
Obesity | 33.2% | 28.4% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lees summit vs Chino hills
- More residents in Lees summit report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 12.7% in Chino hills.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lees summit at 21.8% compared to 14.6% in Chino hills.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lees summit at 13.1% compared to 7.9% in Chino hills.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lees summit at 21.7% compared to 15.3% in Chino hills.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lees summit at 33.2% compared to 28.4% in Chino hills.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lees summit at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Chino hills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lees summit | Chino hills |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (298) | 1.1% (849) |
High School Diploma | 11.1% (11,521) | 9.6% (7,450) |
Less than High School | 3.2% (3,308) | 7.2% (5,599) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.3% (33,401) | 34.4% (26,814) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lees summit vs Chino hills
- In Chino hills, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in Lees summit.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lees summit hold a high school diploma at 11.1% compared to 9.6% in Chino hills.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chino hills at 7.2%, compared to 3.2% in Lees summit.
- In Chino hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 32.3% in Lees summit.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.