Demographics details for Lead hill, AR vs Stillwater, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lead hill, AR vs Stillwater, OK.
| Data | Lead hill | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 282 | 49,160 |
| Median Age | 32.5 years | 23.4 years |
| Median Income | $58,250 | $39,998 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Lead hill vs Stillwater
- The population in Stillwater is higher at 49,160, compared to 282 in Lead hill.
- Residents in Lead hill have a higher median age of 32.5 years compared to 23.4 years in Stillwater.
- Lead hill has a higher median income of $58,250 compared to $39,998 in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lead hill at 38.0% compared to 25.0% in Stillwater.
- The poverty level is higher in Stillwater at 16%, compared to 12% in Lead hill.
- The unemployment rate in Lead hill is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Stillwater.
Demographics
Demographics Lead hill vs Stillwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lead hill | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 94 | 72 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Lead hill vs Stillwater
- In Stillwater, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Lead hill.
- Lead hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 72% in Stillwater.
- In Stillwater, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Lead hill.
- Stillwater has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Lead hill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stillwater at 9%, compared to 6% in Lead hill.
- In Stillwater, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Lead hill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lead hill | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 28.5% | 26.1% |
| Smoking | 22.4% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 33.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lead hill vs Stillwater
- More residents in Lead hill report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 19.1% in Stillwater.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lead hill at 28.5% compared to 26.1% in Stillwater.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lead hill at 22.4% compared to 19.5% in Stillwater.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lead hill at 15.6% compared to 13.6% in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 39.3% in Lead hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lead hill at 33.0% compared to 11.0% in Stillwater.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lead hill | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (1) | 0.5% (239) |
| High School Diploma | 30.9% (87) | 6.5% (3,199) |
| Less than High School | 7.4% (21) | 3.9% (1,910) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.5% (7) | 22.5% (11,068) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lead hill vs Stillwater
- In Stillwater, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Lead hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lead hill hold a high school diploma at 30.9% compared to 6.5% in Stillwater.
- More residents in Lead hill have less than a high school education at 7.4% compared to 3.9% in Stillwater.
- In Stillwater, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 2.5% in Lead hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.