Demographics details for Lawrenceville, IL vs South jordan, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lawrenceville, IL vs South jordan, UT.

Data Lawrenceville South jordan
Population 4,209 83,513
Median Age 37.5 years 34.4 years
Median Income $42,213 $119,822
Married Families 35.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 15% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.7

Population Comparison: Lawrenceville vs South jordan

  • The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 4,209 in Lawrenceville.
  • Residents in Lawrenceville have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
  • South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $42,213 in Lawrenceville.
  • In South jordan, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 35.0% in Lawrenceville.
  • Lawrenceville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in South jordan.
  • The unemployment rate in Lawrenceville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.7% in South jordan.

Demographics

Demographics Lawrenceville vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lawrenceville South jordan
Black 5 Data is updating
White 86 83
Asian 1 4
Hispanic Data is updating 7
Two or More Races 8 5
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Lawrenceville vs South jordan

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lawrenceville at 5% compared to 0% in South jordan.
  • Lawrenceville has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 83% in South jordan.
  • In South jordan, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Lawrenceville.
  • South jordan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Lawrenceville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Lawrenceville at 8% compared to 5% in South jordan.
  • In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lawrenceville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lawrenceville South jordan
Mental Health Not Good 18.5% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% 9.0%
Depression 23.9% 26.5%
Smoking 21.3% 7.3%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 16.9%
Obesity 37.5% 28.6%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lawrenceville vs South jordan

  • More residents in Lawrenceville report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.7% in South jordan.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 23.9% in Lawrenceville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lawrenceville at 21.3% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lawrenceville at 17.0% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lawrenceville at 37.5% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Lawrenceville at 18.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lawrenceville South jordan
No Schooling 0.1% (5) 0.2% (172)
High School Diploma 12.6% (531) 8.4% (6,995)
Less than High School 17.0% (715) 2.7% (2,236)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.4% (478) 27.1% (22,648)

Education Levels Comparison: Lawrenceville vs South jordan

  • In South jordan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.1% in Lawrenceville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lawrenceville hold a high school diploma at 12.6% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
  • More residents in Lawrenceville have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
  • In South jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 11.4% in Lawrenceville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.