Demographics details for Lawrence, PA vs Clarksdale, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lawrence, PA vs Clarksdale, MS.
Data | Lawrence | Clarksdale |
---|---|---|
Population | 84,849 | 13,969 |
Median Age | 45.0 years | 35.4 years |
Median Income | $57,585 | $35,377 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 20.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 27% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 6.9 |
Population Comparison: Lawrence vs Clarksdale
- In Lawrence, the population is higher at 84,849, compared to 13,969 in Clarksdale.
- Residents in Lawrence have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 35.4 years in Clarksdale.
- Lawrence has a higher median income of $57,585 compared to $35,377 in Clarksdale.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lawrence at 41.0% compared to 20.0% in Clarksdale.
- The poverty level is higher in Clarksdale at 27%, compared to 16% in Lawrence.
- Clarksdale has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 4.2% in Lawrence.
Demographics
Demographics Lawrence vs Clarksdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lawrence | Clarksdale |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 86 |
White | 90 | 9 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lawrence vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 86% compared to 4% in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 9% in Clarksdale.
- Both Lawrence and Clarksdale have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Lawrence and Clarksdale at 2%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lawrence at 4% compared to 3% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lawrence and Clarksdale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lawrence | Clarksdale |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 15.8% |
Depression | 24.0% | 20.8% |
Smoking | 20.3% | 25.2% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 11.1% |
Obesity | 36.4% | 50.5% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lawrence vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.6% in Lawrence.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lawrence at 24.0% compared to 20.8% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 20.3% in Lawrence.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lawrence at 18.9% compared to 11.1% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 36.4% in Lawrence.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarksdale at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Lawrence.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lawrence | Clarksdale |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (423) | 2.0% (274) |
High School Diploma | 27.6% (23,416) | 9.2% (1,281) |
Less than High School | 11.2% (9,514) | 15.2% (2,130) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (13,617) | 14.1% (1,964) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lawrence vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.5% in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrence hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 9.2% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarksdale at 15.2%, compared to 11.2% in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrence hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 14.1% in Clarksdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.