Demographics details for Lawrence, MA vs Warner robins, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lawrence, MA vs Warner robins, GA.
Data | Lawrence | Warner robins |
---|---|---|
Population | 87,954 | 82,175 |
Median Age | 31.5 years | 32.4 years |
Median Income | $53,977 | $63,678 |
Married Families | 26.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.1 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Lawrence vs Warner robins
- In Lawrence, the population is higher at 87,954, compared to 82,175 in Warner robins.
- The median age in Warner robins is higher at 32.4 years, compared to 31.5 years in Lawrence.
- Warner robins has a higher median income of $63,678, compared to $53,977 in Lawrence.
- In Warner robins, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 26.0% in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in Warner robins.
- The unemployment rate in Lawrence is higher at 7.1%, compared to 3.8% in Warner robins.
Demographics
Demographics Lawrence vs Warner robins provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lawrence | Warner robins |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 40 |
White | -4 | 42 |
Asian | 2 | 3 |
Hispanic | 82 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lawrence vs Warner robins
- In Warner robins, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 5% in Lawrence.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Warner robins at 42% compared to -4% in Lawrence.
- In Warner robins, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Lawrence.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lawrence at 82% compared to 7% in Warner robins.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lawrence at 15% compared to 7% in Warner robins.
- In Warner robins, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lawrence.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lawrence | Warner robins |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 13.1% |
Depression | 22.4% | 22.1% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 18.6% |
Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 37.4% | 39.9% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lawrence vs Warner robins
- More residents in Lawrence report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.6% in Warner robins.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lawrence at 22.4% compared to 22.1% in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 17.3% in Lawrence.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Warner robins at 15.9% compared to 14.5% in Lawrence.
- Warner robins has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 37.4% in Lawrence.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lawrence at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Warner robins.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lawrence | Warner robins |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (2,366) | 0.4% (335) |
High School Diploma | 18.6% (16,316) | 14.9% (12,260) |
Less than High School | 34.1% (29,963) | 7.0% (5,714) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (8,067) | 19.2% (15,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lawrence vs Warner robins
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrence have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.4% in Warner robins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrence hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 14.9% in Warner robins.
- More residents in Lawrence have less than a high school education at 34.1% compared to 7.0% in Warner robins.
- In Warner robins, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 9.2% in Lawrence.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.