Demographics details for Lawrence, KS vs Valdosta, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lawrence, KS vs Valdosta, GA.
| Data | Lawrence | Valdosta |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 95,794 | 55,074 |
| Median Age | 28.8 years | 29.2 years |
| Median Income | $59,834 | $41,365 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Lawrence vs Valdosta
- In Lawrence, the population is higher at 95,794, compared to 55,074 in Valdosta.
- The median age in Valdosta is higher at 29.2 years, compared to 28.8 years in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher median income of $59,834 compared to $41,365 in Valdosta.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lawrence at 32.0% compared to 25.0% in Valdosta.
- The poverty level is higher in Valdosta at 19%, compared to 12% in Lawrence.
- Valdosta has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.9% in Lawrence.
Demographics
Demographics Lawrence vs Valdosta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lawrence | Valdosta |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 56 |
| White | 71 | 34 |
| Asian | 6 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lawrence vs Valdosta
- In Valdosta, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 5% in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 34% in Valdosta.
- The Asian population is larger in Lawrence at 6% compared to 1% in Valdosta.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lawrence at 7% compared to 5% in Valdosta.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lawrence at 9% compared to 4% in Valdosta.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lawrence at 2% compared to 0% in Valdosta.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lawrence | Valdosta |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 15.4% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 13.0% |
| Obesity | 32.8% | 43.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lawrence vs Valdosta
- In Valdosta, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 16.5% in Lawrence.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lawrence at 22.3% compared to 22.2% in Valdosta.
- Valdosta has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 14.8% in Lawrence.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lawrence at 19.6% compared to 13.0% in Valdosta.
- Valdosta has higher obesity rates at 43.5% compared to 32.8% in Lawrence.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Lawrence and Valdosta at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lawrence | Valdosta |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (466) | 1.0% (538) |
| High School Diploma | 8.2% (7,882) | 16.3% (8,967) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (3,784) | 8.9% (4,906) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.1% (29,776) | 15.9% (8,750) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lawrence vs Valdosta
- In Valdosta, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Lawrence.
- In Valdosta, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.3% compared to 8.2% in Lawrence.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Valdosta at 8.9%, compared to 4.0% in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lawrence hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 15.9% in Valdosta.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.