Demographics details for Lasara, TX vs Forest lake, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lasara, TX vs Forest lake, MN.
Data | Lasara | Forest lake |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,065 | 20,857 |
Median Age | 34.0 years | 37.9 years |
Median Income | $27,500 | $91,157 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Lasara vs Forest lake
- The population in Forest lake is higher at 20,857, compared to 1,065 in Lasara.
- The median age in Forest lake is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 34.0 years in Lasara.
- Forest lake has a higher median income of $91,157, compared to $27,500 in Lasara.
- In Forest lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 37.0% in Lasara.
- Lasara has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- The unemployment rate in Lasara is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.2% in Forest lake.
Demographics
Demographics Lasara vs Forest lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lasara | Forest lake |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 3 |
White | -39 | 81 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | 99 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 40 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lasara vs Forest lake
- In Forest lake, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Lasara.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Forest lake at 81% compared to -39% in Lasara.
- In Forest lake, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Lasara.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lasara at 99% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lasara at 40% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lasara and Forest lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lasara | Forest lake |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 14.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.8% | 8.8% |
Depression | 21.8% | 24.1% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 15.7% |
Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 21.4% |
Obesity | 45.3% | 32.9% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lasara vs Forest lake
- More residents in Lasara report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 14.7% in Forest lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Forest lake at 24.1% versus 21.8% in Lasara.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lasara at 18.6% compared to 15.7% in Forest lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Forest lake at 21.4% compared to 14.8% in Lasara.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lasara at 45.3% compared to 32.9% in Forest lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lasara at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Forest lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lasara | Forest lake |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 5.5% (59) | 0.5% (101) |
High School Diploma | 15.0% (160) | 14.6% (3,055) |
Less than High School | 47.1% (502) | 7.7% (1,615) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.5% (59) | 24.6% (5,123) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lasara vs Forest lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Lasara have no formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.5% in Forest lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lasara hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 14.6% in Forest lake.
- More residents in Lasara have less than a high school education at 47.1% compared to 7.7% in Forest lake.
- In Forest lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.6% compared to 5.5% in Lasara.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.