Demographics details for Lanett, AL vs Westminster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lanett, AL vs Westminster, CA.
| Data | Lanett | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,759 | 89,397 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 41.6 years |
| Median Income | $48,125 | $80,271 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Lanett vs Westminster
- The population in Westminster is higher at 89,397, compared to 6,759 in Lanett.
- The median age in Westminster is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 39.9 years in Lanett.
- Westminster has a higher median income of $80,271, compared to $48,125 in Lanett.
- In Westminster, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 24.0% in Lanett.
- The poverty level is higher in Westminster at 11%, compared to 0% in Lanett.
- Westminster has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.2% in Lanett.
Demographics
Demographics Lanett vs Westminster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lanett | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 73 | 1 |
| White | 16 | 16 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 51 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 24 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lanett vs Westminster
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lanett at 73% compared to 1% in Westminster.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Lanett and Westminster at 16%.
- In Westminster, the Asian population stands at 51%, greater than 0% in Lanett.
- Westminster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 8% in Lanett.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Westminster at 8%, compared to 3% in Lanett.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lanett and Westminster at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lanett | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 15.3% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 12.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 13.0% |
| Obesity | 46.5% | 23.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lanett vs Westminster
- More residents in Lanett report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 14.9% in Westminster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lanett at 22.1% compared to 15.3% in Westminster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lanett at 21.6% compared to 12.5% in Westminster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Westminster at 13.0% compared to 12.7% in Lanett.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lanett at 46.5% compared to 23.4% in Westminster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lanett at 22.0% compared to 12.0% in Westminster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lanett | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (90) | 4.5% (4,006) |
| High School Diploma | 18.9% (1,277) | 16.0% (14,303) |
| Less than High School | 20.3% (1,369) | 21.5% (19,217) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.4% (498) | 18.5% (16,558) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lanett vs Westminster
- In Westminster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 1.3% in Lanett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lanett hold a high school diploma at 18.9% compared to 16.0% in Westminster.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Westminster at 21.5%, compared to 20.3% in Lanett.
- In Westminster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.5% compared to 7.4% in Lanett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.