Demographics details for Lake grove, NY vs Cambridge, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lake grove, NY vs Cambridge, OH.
Data | Lake grove | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Population | 11,041 | 9,985 |
Median Age | 40.6 years | 35.1 years |
Median Income | $114,381 | $39,589 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 3% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Lake grove vs Cambridge
- In Lake grove, the population is higher at 11,041, compared to 9,985 in Cambridge.
- Residents in Lake grove have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 35.1 years in Cambridge.
- Lake grove has a higher median income of $114,381 compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lake grove at 42.0% compared to 28.0% in Cambridge.
- The poverty level is higher in Cambridge at 16%, compared to 3% in Lake grove.
- Cambridge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Lake grove.
Demographics
Demographics Lake grove vs Cambridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lake grove | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 6 |
White | 66 | 88 |
Asian | 10 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 14 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lake grove vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 3% in Lake grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cambridge at 88% compared to 66% in Lake grove.
- The Asian population is larger in Lake grove at 10% compared to 0% in Cambridge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lake grove at 14% compared to 2% in Cambridge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lake grove at 7% compared to 4% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lake grove and Cambridge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lake grove | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.6% | 20.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 15.1% |
Depression | 19.3% | 25.9% |
Smoking | 11.9% | 26.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 27.4% | 46.4% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lake grove vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 13.6% in Lake grove.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cambridge at 25.9% versus 19.3% in Lake grove.
- Cambridge has a higher smoking rate at 26.2% compared to 11.9% in Lake grove.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lake grove at 17.2% compared to 16.9% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has higher obesity rates at 46.4% compared to 27.4% in Lake grove.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cambridge at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Lake grove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lake grove | Cambridge |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (87) | 0.7% (73) |
High School Diploma | 14.7% (1,619) | 25.1% (2,502) |
Less than High School | 5.7% (630) | 17.3% (1,732) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.6% (3,493) | 8.8% (875) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lake grove vs Cambridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Lake grove have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Cambridge.
- In Cambridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 14.7% in Lake grove.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cambridge at 17.3%, compared to 5.7% in Lake grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lake grove hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.6% compared to 8.8% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.