Demographics details for Lafayette, TN vs Marshall, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lafayette, TN vs Marshall, TX.
| Data | Lafayette | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,716 | 23,641 |
| Median Age | 30.6 years | 34.1 years |
| Median Income | $40,240 | $49,162 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Lafayette vs Marshall
- The population in Marshall is higher at 23,641, compared to 5,716 in Lafayette.
- The median age in Marshall is higher at 34.1 years, compared to 30.6 years in Lafayette.
- Marshall has a higher median income of $49,162, compared to $40,240 in Lafayette.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Lafayette and Marshall at 27.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Marshall at 17%, compared to 12% in Lafayette.
- Marshall has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.5% in Lafayette.
Demographics
Demographics Lafayette vs Marshall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lafayette | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 40 |
| White | 76 | 28 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lafayette vs Marshall
- In Marshall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 1% in Lafayette.
- Lafayette has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 28% in Marshall.
- In Marshall, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Lafayette.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 15% in Lafayette.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Marshall at 11%, compared to 8% in Lafayette.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lafayette and Marshall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lafayette | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.4% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.5% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 31.0% | 22.7% |
| Smoking | 28.6% | 21.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lafayette vs Marshall
- More residents in Lafayette report poor mental health at 22.4% compared to 19.2% in Marshall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lafayette at 31.0% compared to 22.7% in Marshall.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lafayette at 28.6% compared to 21.0% in Marshall.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Marshall at 16.2% compared to 14.8% in Lafayette.
- Marshall has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 37.6% in Lafayette.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lafayette at 21.0% compared to 17.0% in Marshall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lafayette | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (9) | 0.8% (195) |
| High School Diploma | 17.3% (990) | 18.7% (4,412) |
| Less than High School | 28.4% (1,625) | 10.7% (2,527) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.0% (343) | 13.2% (3,127) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lafayette vs Marshall
- In Marshall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.2% in Lafayette.
- In Marshall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.7% compared to 17.3% in Lafayette.
- More residents in Lafayette have less than a high school education at 28.4% compared to 10.7% in Marshall.
- In Marshall, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 6.0% in Lafayette.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.