Demographics details for Lafayette, IN vs Loves park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lafayette, IN vs Loves park, IL.
Data | Lafayette | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Population | 71,402 | 23,365 |
Median Age | 33.0 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $50,674 | $56,370 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Lafayette vs Loves park
- In Lafayette, the population is higher at 71,402, compared to 23,365 in Loves park.
- The median age in Loves park is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 33.0 years in Lafayette.
- Loves park has a higher median income of $56,370, compared to $50,674 in Lafayette.
- In Loves park, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 33.0% in Lafayette.
- Lafayette has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 9% in Loves park.
- The unemployment rate in Lafayette is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Lafayette vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lafayette | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 7 |
White | 72 | 71 |
Asian | 2 | 3 |
Hispanic | 12 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lafayette vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lafayette at 9% compared to 7% in Loves park.
- Lafayette has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 71% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Lafayette.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lafayette at 12% compared to 10% in Loves park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 5% in Lafayette.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lafayette and Loves park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lafayette | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 11.3% |
Depression | 25.4% | 21.3% |
Smoking | 18.9% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 34.2% | 39.4% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lafayette vs Loves park
- More residents in Lafayette report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lafayette at 25.4% compared to 21.3% in Loves park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lafayette at 18.9% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Lafayette and Loves park at 17.0%.
- Loves park has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 34.2% in Lafayette.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Lafayette.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lafayette | Loves park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (735) | 0.4% (97) |
High School Diploma | 18.6% (13,253) | 17.1% (3,994) |
Less than High School | 12.4% (8,844) | 9.7% (2,262) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.9% (12,763) | 17.4% (4,064) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lafayette vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of residents in Lafayette have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lafayette hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 17.1% in Loves park.
- More residents in Lafayette have less than a high school education at 12.4% compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lafayette hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.