Demographics details for Lafayette, CA vs Mukwonago, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lafayette, CA vs Mukwonago, WI.
Data | Lafayette | Mukwonago |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,044 | 8,446 |
Median Age | 45.4 years | 39.7 years |
Median Income | $219,250 | $91,827 |
Married Families | 52.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 2% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Lafayette vs Mukwonago
- In Lafayette, the population is higher at 25,044, compared to 8,446 in Mukwonago.
- Residents in Lafayette have a higher median age of 45.4 years compared to 39.7 years in Mukwonago.
- Lafayette has a higher median income of $219,250 compared to $91,827 in Mukwonago.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lafayette at 52.0% compared to 44.0% in Mukwonago.
- The poverty level is higher in Mukwonago at 5%, compared to 2% in Lafayette.
- The unemployment rate in Lafayette is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.4% in Mukwonago.
Demographics
Demographics Lafayette vs Mukwonago provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lafayette | Mukwonago |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 71 | 82 |
Asian | 10 | 4 |
Hispanic | 8 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lafayette vs Mukwonago
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lafayette at 1% compared to 0% in Mukwonago.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mukwonago at 82% compared to 71% in Lafayette.
- The Asian population is larger in Lafayette at 10% compared to 4% in Mukwonago.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lafayette at 8% compared to 7% in Mukwonago.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lafayette at 10% compared to 7% in Mukwonago.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lafayette and Mukwonago at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lafayette | Mukwonago |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 13.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.0% | 8.6% |
Depression | 17.5% | 21.2% |
Smoking | 6.6% | 13.8% |
Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 25.2% |
Obesity | 21.1% | 35.3% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lafayette vs Mukwonago
- In Mukwonago, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.8% compared to 12.5% in Lafayette.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mukwonago at 21.2% versus 17.5% in Lafayette.
- Mukwonago has a higher smoking rate at 13.8% compared to 6.6% in Lafayette.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mukwonago at 25.2% compared to 18.7% in Lafayette.
- Mukwonago has higher obesity rates at 35.3% compared to 21.1% in Lafayette.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mukwonago at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Lafayette.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lafayette | Mukwonago |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (86) | 0.6% (48) |
High School Diploma | 3.3% (814) | 17.0% (1,435) |
Less than High School | 2.1% (526) | 4.7% (394) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 53.4% (13,378) | 25.3% (2,138) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lafayette vs Mukwonago
- In Mukwonago, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Lafayette.
- In Mukwonago, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 3.3% in Lafayette.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mukwonago at 4.7%, compared to 2.1% in Lafayette.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lafayette hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 53.4% compared to 25.3% in Mukwonago.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.