Demographics details for La porte, IN vs Marshall, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in La porte, IN vs Marshall, TX.
| Data | La porte | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,198 | 23,641 |
| Median Age | 35.0 years | 34.1 years |
| Median Income | $55,031 | $49,162 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: La porte vs Marshall
- The population in Marshall is higher at 23,641, compared to 22,198 in La porte.
- Residents in La porte have a higher median age of 35.0 years compared to 34.1 years in Marshall.
- La porte has a higher median income of $55,031 compared to $49,162 in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in La porte at 32.0% compared to 27.0% in Marshall.
- The poverty level is higher in Marshall at 17%, compared to 12% in La porte.
- Marshall has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.2% in La porte.
Demographics
Demographics La porte vs Marshall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | La porte | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 40 |
| White | 75 | 28 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: La porte vs Marshall
- In Marshall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 3% in La porte.
- La porte has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 28% in Marshall.
- Both La porte and Marshall have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 13% in La porte.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Marshall at 11%, compared to 8% in La porte.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both La porte and Marshall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | La porte | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 27.3% | 22.7% |
| Smoking | 22.1% | 21.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: La porte vs Marshall
- In Marshall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.2% in La porte.
- Depression is more prevalent in La porte at 27.3% compared to 22.7% in Marshall.
- Smoking is more prevalent in La porte at 22.1% compared to 21.0% in Marshall.
- Binge drinking is more common in La porte at 16.7% compared to 16.2% in Marshall.
- Marshall has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 36.6% in La porte.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Marshall at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in La porte.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | La porte | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (173) | 0.8% (195) |
| High School Diploma | 21.2% (4,715) | 18.7% (4,412) |
| Less than High School | 16.1% (3,566) | 10.7% (2,527) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (2,694) | 13.2% (3,127) |
Education Levels Comparison: La porte vs Marshall
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both La porte and Marshall at 0.8%.
- A higher percentage of residents in La porte hold a high school diploma at 21.2% compared to 18.7% in Marshall.
- More residents in La porte have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 10.7% in Marshall.
- In Marshall, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 12.1% in La porte.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.