Demographics details for Kosciusko, MS vs Tullahoma, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kosciusko, MS vs Tullahoma, TN.
| Data | Kosciusko | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,922 | 20,830 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 40.2 years |
| Median Income | $33,719 | $56,771 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Kosciusko vs Tullahoma
- The population in Tullahoma is higher at 20,830, compared to 6,922 in Kosciusko.
- The median age in Tullahoma is higher at 40.2 years, compared to 36.2 years in Kosciusko.
- Tullahoma has a higher median income of $56,771, compared to $33,719 in Kosciusko.
- In Tullahoma, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 25.0% in Kosciusko.
- Kosciusko has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 10% in Tullahoma.
- The unemployment rate in Kosciusko is higher at 6.5%, compared to 3.5% in Tullahoma.
Demographics
Demographics Kosciusko vs Tullahoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kosciusko | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 53 | 6 |
| White | 42 | 83 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kosciusko vs Tullahoma
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Kosciusko at 53% compared to 6% in Tullahoma.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Tullahoma at 83% compared to 42% in Kosciusko.
- In Tullahoma, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Kosciusko.
- Tullahoma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tullahoma at 4%, compared to 3% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kosciusko and Tullahoma at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kosciusko | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.2% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 28.9% |
| Smoking | 26.1% | 22.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.3% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 46.0% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kosciusko vs Tullahoma
- In Tullahoma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 19.8% in Kosciusko.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tullahoma at 28.9% versus 22.8% in Kosciusko.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kosciusko at 26.1% compared to 22.6% in Tullahoma.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tullahoma at 15.1% compared to 11.3% in Kosciusko.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kosciusko at 46.0% compared to 39.1% in Tullahoma.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tullahoma at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Kosciusko.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kosciusko | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (39) | 0.6% (117) |
| High School Diploma | 18.4% (1,276) | 18.9% (3,932) |
| Less than High School | 9.0% (624) | 14.1% (2,944) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (886) | 19.3% (4,012) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kosciusko vs Tullahoma
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Kosciusko and Tullahoma at 0.6%.
- In Tullahoma, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 18.4% in Kosciusko.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tullahoma at 14.1%, compared to 9.0% in Kosciusko.
- In Tullahoma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 12.8% in Kosciusko.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.