Demographics details for Klamath falls, OR vs Boston, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Klamath falls, OR vs Boston, MA.
Data | Klamath falls | Boston |
---|---|---|
Population | 21,977 | 650,706 |
Median Age | 35.1 years | 32.9 years |
Median Income | $46,695 | $89,212 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Klamath falls vs Boston
- The population in Boston is higher at 650,706, compared to 21,977 in Klamath falls.
- Residents in Klamath falls have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 32.9 years in Boston.
- Boston has a higher median income of $89,212, compared to $46,695 in Klamath falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Klamath falls at 31.0% compared to 28.0% in Boston.
- Klamath falls has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 12% in Boston.
- The unemployment rate in Klamath falls is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.1% in Boston.
Demographics
Demographics Klamath falls vs Boston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Klamath falls | Boston |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 23 |
White | 69 | 35 |
Asian | 1 | 10 |
Hispanic | 15 | 20 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 12 |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Klamath falls vs Boston
- In Boston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
- Klamath falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 35% in Boston.
- In Boston, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 1% in Klamath falls.
- Boston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 15% in Klamath falls.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Boston at 12%, compared to 11% in Klamath falls.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Klamath falls at 3% compared to 0% in Boston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Klamath falls | Boston |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 15.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 9.9% |
Depression | 28.4% | 20.8% |
Smoking | 19.9% | 13.3% |
Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 17.8% |
Obesity | 35.9% | 25.6% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Klamath falls vs Boston
- More residents in Klamath falls report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 15.7% in Boston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Klamath falls at 28.4% compared to 20.8% in Boston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Klamath falls at 19.9% compared to 13.3% in Boston.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Boston at 17.8% compared to 15.8% in Klamath falls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Klamath falls at 35.9% compared to 25.6% in Boston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Klamath falls at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Boston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Klamath falls | Boston |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (192) | 1.9% (12,293) |
High School Diploma | 16.0% (3,508) | 11.1% (72,385) |
Less than High School | 15.5% (3,401) | 12.6% (82,156) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (3,175) | 38.1% (248,216) |
Education Levels Comparison: Klamath falls vs Boston
- In Boston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.9% in Klamath falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Klamath falls hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 11.1% in Boston.
- More residents in Klamath falls have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 12.6% in Boston.
- In Boston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 14.4% in Klamath falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.