Demographics details for Kings beach, CA vs Fairfield, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kings beach, CA vs Fairfield, IA.
| Data | Kings beach | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,589 | 9,464 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $50,220 | $44,277 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Kings beach vs Fairfield
- The population in Fairfield is higher at 9,464, compared to 2,589 in Kings beach.
- The median age in Fairfield is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 40.5 years in Kings beach.
- Kings beach has a higher median income of $50,220 compared to $44,277 in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kings beach at 39.0% compared to 32.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is identical in both Kings beach and Fairfield at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Kings beach is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Kings beach vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kings beach | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 8 |
| White | 39 | 73 |
| Asian | 1 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 53 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Kings beach vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Kings beach.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairfield at 73% compared to 39% in Kings beach.
- In Fairfield, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 1% in Kings beach.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Kings beach at 53% compared to 5% in Fairfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Kings beach at 7% compared to 4% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Kings beach.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kings beach | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 18.6% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 12.5% | 17.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 31.8% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kings beach vs Fairfield
- More residents in Kings beach report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 15.5% in Fairfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairfield at 20.1% versus 18.6% in Kings beach.
- Fairfield has a higher smoking rate at 17.1% compared to 12.5% in Kings beach.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairfield at 19.8% compared to 17.4% in Kings beach.
- Fairfield has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 31.8% in Kings beach.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairfield at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Kings beach.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kings beach | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (40) | 0.1% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 17.3% (448) | 12.1% (1,145) |
| Less than High School | 37.9% (982) | 6.3% (594) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (502) | 38.1% (3,604) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kings beach vs Fairfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Kings beach have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kings beach hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 12.1% in Fairfield.
- More residents in Kings beach have less than a high school education at 37.9% compared to 6.3% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 19.4% in Kings beach.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.