Demographics details for Kingman, KS vs Clemmons, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kingman, KS vs Clemmons, NC.
Data | Kingman | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,193 | 21,823 |
Median Age | 43.6 years | 42.4 years |
Median Income | $59,640 | $75,667 |
Married Families | 51.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Kingman vs Clemmons
- The population in Clemmons is higher at 21,823, compared to 7,193 in Kingman.
- Residents in Kingman have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 42.4 years in Clemmons.
- Clemmons has a higher median income of $75,667, compared to $59,640 in Kingman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kingman at 51.0% compared to 45.0% in Clemmons.
- The poverty level is higher in Clemmons at 5%, compared to 0% in Kingman.
- Clemmons has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.3% in Kingman.
Demographics
Demographics Kingman vs Clemmons provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kingman | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 6 |
White | 92 | 76 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 4 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Kingman vs Clemmons
- In Clemmons, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Kingman.
- Kingman has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 76% in Clemmons.
- In Clemmons, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Kingman.
- Clemmons has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 4% in Kingman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clemmons at 6%, compared to 4% in Kingman.
- In Clemmons, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Kingman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kingman | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 13.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 8.8% |
Depression | 20.5% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 17.7% | 12.5% |
Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 17.8% |
Obesity | 37.7% | 29.7% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kingman vs Clemmons
- More residents in Kingman report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 13.9% in Clemmons.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clemmons at 23.7% versus 20.5% in Kingman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Kingman at 17.7% compared to 12.5% in Clemmons.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kingman at 20.4% compared to 17.8% in Clemmons.
- Obesity rates are higher in Kingman at 37.7% compared to 29.7% in Clemmons.
- Disability percentages are higher in Kingman at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Clemmons.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kingman | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (35) | 0.6% (140) |
High School Diploma | 19.9% (1,430) | 9.3% (2,040) |
Less than High School | 13.1% (939) | 6.5% (1,429) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.6% (1,268) | 34.0% (7,418) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kingman vs Clemmons
- In Clemmons, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Kingman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kingman hold a high school diploma at 19.9% compared to 9.3% in Clemmons.
- More residents in Kingman have less than a high school education at 13.1% compared to 6.5% in Clemmons.
- In Clemmons, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.0% compared to 17.6% in Kingman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.