Demographics details for Kinderhook, IL vs Cuthbert, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kinderhook, IL vs Cuthbert, GA.
Data | Kinderhook | Cuthbert |
---|---|---|
Population | 186 | 2,939 |
Median Age | 29.5 years | 37.6 years |
Median Income | $59,583 | $21,278 |
Married Families | 49.0% | 16.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 28% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Kinderhook vs Cuthbert
- The population in Cuthbert is higher at 2,939, compared to 186 in Kinderhook.
- The median age in Cuthbert is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 29.5 years in Kinderhook.
- Kinderhook has a higher median income of $59,583 compared to $21,278 in Cuthbert.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kinderhook at 49.0% compared to 16.0% in Cuthbert.
- The poverty level is higher in Cuthbert at 28%, compared to 7% in Kinderhook.
- Cuthbert has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 3.5% in Kinderhook.
Demographics
Demographics Kinderhook vs Cuthbert provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Kinderhook | Cuthbert |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 92 |
White | 98 | 1 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 4 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Kinderhook vs Cuthbert
- In Cuthbert, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 92% compared to 0% in Kinderhook.
- Kinderhook has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 1% in Cuthbert.
- The Asian population is larger in Kinderhook at 1% compared to 0% in Cuthbert.
- Cuthbert has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Kinderhook.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cuthbert at 3%, compared to 1% in Kinderhook.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Kinderhook and Cuthbert at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Kinderhook | Cuthbert |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 21.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 18.1% |
Depression | 22.2% | 20.9% |
Smoking | 18.2% | 27.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 11.1% |
Obesity | 37.4% | 50.4% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kinderhook vs Cuthbert
- In Cuthbert, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.4% compared to 16.7% in Kinderhook.
- Depression is more prevalent in Kinderhook at 22.2% compared to 20.9% in Cuthbert.
- Cuthbert has a higher smoking rate at 27.3% compared to 18.2% in Kinderhook.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kinderhook at 16.4% compared to 11.1% in Cuthbert.
- Cuthbert has higher obesity rates at 50.4% compared to 37.4% in Kinderhook.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cuthbert at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Kinderhook.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Kinderhook | Cuthbert |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (2) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 27.4% (51) | 20.6% (604) |
Less than High School | 10.8% (20) | 17.1% (502) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (20) | 9.6% (282) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kinderhook vs Cuthbert
- A higher percentage of residents in Kinderhook have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Cuthbert.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kinderhook hold a high school diploma at 27.4% compared to 20.6% in Cuthbert.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cuthbert at 17.1%, compared to 10.8% in Kinderhook.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kinderhook hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.8% compared to 9.6% in Cuthbert.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.