Demographics details for Kewaskum, WI vs Longview, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Kewaskum, WI vs Longview, WA.
| Data | Kewaskum | Longview |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,412 | 37,782 |
| Median Age | 38.2 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $92,500 | $57,920 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Kewaskum vs Longview
- The population in Longview is higher at 37,782, compared to 4,412 in Kewaskum.
- The median age in Longview is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 38.2 years in Kewaskum.
- Kewaskum has a higher median income of $92,500 compared to $57,920 in Longview.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Kewaskum at 46.0% compared to 33.0% in Longview.
- The poverty level is higher in Longview at 12%, compared to 5% in Kewaskum.
- Longview has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.2% in Kewaskum.
Demographics
Demographics Kewaskum vs Longview provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Kewaskum | Longview |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 89 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Kewaskum vs Longview
- In Longview, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Kewaskum.
- Kewaskum has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 76% in Longview.
- In Longview, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Kewaskum.
- Longview has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 6% in Kewaskum.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Longview at 10%, compared to 5% in Kewaskum.
- In Longview, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Kewaskum.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Kewaskum | Longview |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 21.7% | 29.4% |
| Smoking | 13.4% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 26.0% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 33.0% | 38.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Kewaskum vs Longview
- In Longview, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 13.8% in Kewaskum.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Longview at 29.4% versus 21.7% in Kewaskum.
- Longview has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 13.4% in Kewaskum.
- Binge drinking is more common in Kewaskum at 26.0% compared to 16.0% in Longview.
- Longview has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 33.0% in Kewaskum.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Longview at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Kewaskum.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Kewaskum | Longview |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (13) | 1.3% (494) |
| High School Diploma | 21.3% (941) | 17.2% (6,511) |
| Less than High School | 10.9% (482) | 15.1% (5,701) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (768) | 11.0% (4,167) |
Education Levels Comparison: Kewaskum vs Longview
- In Longview, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.3% in Kewaskum.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kewaskum hold a high school diploma at 21.3% compared to 17.2% in Longview.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Longview at 15.1%, compared to 10.9% in Kewaskum.
- A higher percentage of residents in Kewaskum hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 11.0% in Longview.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.