Demographics details for Junction city, KS vs Central point, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Junction city, KS vs Central point, OR.

Data Junction city Central point
Population 22,264 19,222
Median Age 28.5 years 40.3 years
Median Income $60,709 $79,731
Married Families 40.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 13% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.8 4.5

Population Comparison: Junction city vs Central point

  • In Junction city, the population is higher at 22,264, compared to 19,222 in Central point.
  • The median age in Central point is higher at 40.3 years, compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
  • Central point has a higher median income of $79,731, compared to $60,709 in Junction city.
  • In Central point, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 40.0% in Junction city.
  • Junction city has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Central point.
  • The unemployment rate in Junction city is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.5% in Central point.

Demographics

Demographics Junction city vs Central point provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Junction city Central point
Black 20 Data is updating
White 43 76
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 18 15
Two or More Races 15 7
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Junction city vs Central point

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Junction city at 20% compared to 0% in Central point.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Central point at 76% compared to 43% in Junction city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Junction city at 3% compared to 1% in Central point.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Junction city at 18% compared to 15% in Central point.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Junction city at 15% compared to 7% in Central point.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Junction city and Central point at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Junction city Central point
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% 19.4%
Physical Health Not Good 11.0% 12.0%
Depression 19.2% 29.4%
Smoking 18.5% 16.7%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 16.5%
Obesity 41.8% 30.1%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Junction city vs Central point

  • In Central point, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.1% in Junction city.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Central point at 29.4% versus 19.2% in Junction city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Junction city at 18.5% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Junction city at 16.6% compared to 16.5% in Central point.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Junction city at 41.8% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Junction city at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Junction city Central point
No Schooling 1.0% (216) 1.7% (319)
High School Diploma 12.4% (2,755) 16.1% (3,095)
Less than High School 6.9% (1,535) 13.2% (2,530)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.2% (2,941) 15.6% (3,003)

Education Levels Comparison: Junction city vs Central point

  • In Central point, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.0% in Junction city.
  • In Central point, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.1% compared to 12.4% in Junction city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central point at 13.2%, compared to 6.9% in Junction city.
  • In Central point, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 13.2% in Junction city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.