Demographics details for Jim thorpe, PA vs Los angeles, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jim thorpe, PA vs Los angeles, CA.
| Data | Jim thorpe | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,545 | 3,822,238 |
| Median Age | 49.0 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $64,594 | $76,244 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Jim thorpe vs Los angeles
- The population in Los angeles is higher at 3,822,238, compared to 4,545 in Jim thorpe.
- Residents in Jim thorpe have a higher median age of 49.0 years compared to 36.5 years in Los angeles.
- Los angeles has a higher median income of $76,244, compared to $64,594 in Jim thorpe.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jim thorpe at 36.0% compared to 33.0% in Los angeles.
- The poverty level is higher in Los angeles at 17%, compared to 10% in Jim thorpe.
- Los angeles has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 4.5% in Jim thorpe.
Demographics
Demographics Jim thorpe vs Los angeles provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jim thorpe | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 9 |
| White | 96 | 16 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 12 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 49 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Jim thorpe vs Los angeles
- In Los angeles, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Jim thorpe.
- Jim thorpe has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 16% in Los angeles.
- In Los angeles, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Jim thorpe.
- Los angeles has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 3% in Jim thorpe.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Los angeles at 13%, compared to 0% in Jim thorpe.
- In Los angeles, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Jim thorpe.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jim thorpe | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 16.1% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 35.4% | 29.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jim thorpe vs Los angeles
- More residents in Jim thorpe report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 15.8% in Los angeles.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jim thorpe at 24.5% compared to 16.1% in Los angeles.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jim thorpe at 20.0% compared to 11.8% in Los angeles.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jim thorpe at 18.5% compared to 14.9% in Los angeles.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jim thorpe at 35.4% compared to 29.5% in Los angeles.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jim thorpe at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Los angeles.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jim thorpe | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (16) | 3.0% (116,335) |
| High School Diploma | 27.4% (1,244) | 12.1% (461,986) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (320) | 28.8% (1,101,987) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (769) | 26.2% (1,002,780) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jim thorpe vs Los angeles
- In Los angeles, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.4% in Jim thorpe.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jim thorpe hold a high school diploma at 27.4% compared to 12.1% in Los angeles.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Los angeles at 28.8%, compared to 7.0% in Jim thorpe.
- In Los angeles, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 16.9% in Jim thorpe.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.