Demographics details for Jim thorpe, PA vs Hyattsville, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Jim thorpe, PA vs Hyattsville, MD.

Data Jim thorpe Hyattsville
Population 4,545 20,675
Median Age 49.0 years 35.5 years
Median Income $64,594 $90,329
Married Families 36.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 10% 11%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Jim thorpe vs Hyattsville

  • The population in Hyattsville is higher at 20,675, compared to 4,545 in Jim thorpe.
  • Residents in Jim thorpe have a higher median age of 49.0 years compared to 35.5 years in Hyattsville.
  • Hyattsville has a higher median income of $90,329, compared to $64,594 in Jim thorpe.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Jim thorpe at 36.0% compared to 33.0% in Hyattsville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Hyattsville at 11%, compared to 10% in Jim thorpe.
  • The unemployment rate in Jim thorpe is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Hyattsville.

Demographics

Demographics Jim thorpe vs Hyattsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Jim thorpe Hyattsville
Black 1 28
White 96 21
Asian Data is updating 7
Hispanic 3 36
Two or More Races Data is updating 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Jim thorpe vs Hyattsville

  • In Hyattsville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 1% in Jim thorpe.
  • Jim thorpe has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 21% in Hyattsville.
  • In Hyattsville, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Jim thorpe.
  • Hyattsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 3% in Jim thorpe.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hyattsville at 7%, compared to 0% in Jim thorpe.
  • In Hyattsville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Jim thorpe.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Jim thorpe Hyattsville
Mental Health Not Good 17.4% 13.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.1% 9.7%
Depression 24.5% 13.8%
Smoking 20.0% 11.7%
Binge Drinking 18.5% 12.8%
Obesity 35.4% 38.0%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Jim thorpe vs Hyattsville

  • More residents in Jim thorpe report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 13.8% in Hyattsville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Jim thorpe at 24.5% compared to 13.8% in Hyattsville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Jim thorpe at 20.0% compared to 11.7% in Hyattsville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Jim thorpe at 18.5% compared to 12.8% in Hyattsville.
  • Hyattsville has higher obesity rates at 38.0% compared to 35.4% in Jim thorpe.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Jim thorpe at 21.0% compared to 7.0% in Hyattsville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Jim thorpe Hyattsville
No Schooling 0.4% (16) 3.3% (682)
High School Diploma 27.4% (1,244) 10.3% (2,131)
Less than High School 7.0% (320) 26.0% (5,380)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.9% (769) 33.1% (6,840)

Education Levels Comparison: Jim thorpe vs Hyattsville

  • In Hyattsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 0.4% in Jim thorpe.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Jim thorpe hold a high school diploma at 27.4% compared to 10.3% in Hyattsville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hyattsville at 26.0%, compared to 7.0% in Jim thorpe.
  • In Hyattsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 16.9% in Jim thorpe.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.