Demographics details for Jim thorpe, PA vs Grand junction, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jim thorpe, PA vs Grand junction, CO.
| Data | Jim thorpe | Grand junction |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,545 | 68,034 |
| Median Age | 49.0 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $64,594 | $62,993 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Jim thorpe vs Grand junction
- The population in Grand junction is higher at 68,034, compared to 4,545 in Jim thorpe.
- Residents in Jim thorpe have a higher median age of 49.0 years compared to 39.9 years in Grand junction.
- Jim thorpe has a higher median income of $64,594 compared to $62,993 in Grand junction.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Jim thorpe at 36.0% compared to 35.0% in Grand junction.
- The poverty level is identical in both Jim thorpe and Grand junction at 10%.
- Grand junction has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.5% in Jim thorpe.
Demographics
Demographics Jim thorpe vs Grand junction provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Jim thorpe | Grand junction |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 96 | 73 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Jim thorpe vs Grand junction
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Jim thorpe and Grand junction at 1%.
- Jim thorpe has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 73% in Grand junction.
- In Grand junction, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Jim thorpe.
- Grand junction has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 3% in Jim thorpe.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grand junction at 8%, compared to 0% in Jim thorpe.
- In Grand junction, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Jim thorpe.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Jim thorpe | Grand junction |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 20.0% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | 35.4% | 29.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jim thorpe vs Grand junction
- In Grand junction, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.4% in Jim thorpe.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 24.5%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jim thorpe at 20.0% compared to 17.3% in Grand junction.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 18.5% in Jim thorpe.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jim thorpe at 35.4% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jim thorpe at 21.0% compared to 15.0% in Grand junction.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Jim thorpe | Grand junction |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (16) | 0.4% (245) |
| High School Diploma | 27.4% (1,244) | 13.9% (9,476) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (320) | 9.7% (6,605) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (769) | 23.8% (16,201) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jim thorpe vs Grand junction
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Jim thorpe and Grand junction at 0.4%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jim thorpe hold a high school diploma at 27.4% compared to 13.9% in Grand junction.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grand junction at 9.7%, compared to 7.0% in Jim thorpe.
- In Grand junction, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 16.9% in Jim thorpe.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.