Demographics details for Iuka, MS vs Moreno valley, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Iuka, MS vs Moreno valley, CA.
| Data | Iuka | Moreno valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,096 | 211,924 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 31.8 years |
| Median Income | $43,887 | $82,637 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Iuka vs Moreno valley
- The population in Moreno valley is higher at 211,924, compared to 3,096 in Iuka.
- Residents in Iuka have a higher median age of 37.2 years compared to 31.8 years in Moreno valley.
- Moreno valley has a higher median income of $82,637, compared to $43,887 in Iuka.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Iuka at 40.0% compared to 34.0% in Moreno valley.
- Iuka has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 16% in Moreno valley.
- Moreno valley has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 5.0% in Iuka.
Demographics
Demographics Iuka vs Moreno valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Iuka | Moreno valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 17 |
| White | 94 | 6 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 60 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Iuka vs Moreno valley
- In Moreno valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 4% in Iuka.
- Iuka has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 6% in Moreno valley.
- In Moreno valley, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Iuka.
- Moreno valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 60%, compared to 0% in Iuka.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Moreno valley at 11%, compared to 2% in Iuka.
- In Moreno valley, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Iuka.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Iuka | Moreno valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 16.6% |
| Smoking | 25.7% | 14.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 38.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Iuka vs Moreno valley
- More residents in Iuka report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 16.4% in Moreno valley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Iuka at 26.4% compared to 16.6% in Moreno valley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Iuka at 25.7% compared to 14.0% in Moreno valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Moreno valley at 15.3% compared to 14.6% in Iuka.
- Obesity rates are higher in Iuka at 40.0% compared to 38.2% in Moreno valley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Iuka at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Moreno valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Iuka | Moreno valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (75) | 2.1% (4,503) |
| High School Diploma | 19.9% (616) | 16.2% (34,348) |
| Less than High School | 21.0% (650) | 23.9% (50,595) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.2% (348) | 10.4% (22,123) |
Education Levels Comparison: Iuka vs Moreno valley
- A higher percentage of residents in Iuka have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 2.1% in Moreno valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Iuka hold a high school diploma at 19.9% compared to 16.2% in Moreno valley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Moreno valley at 23.9%, compared to 21.0% in Iuka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Iuka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.2% compared to 10.4% in Moreno valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.