Demographics details for Iuka, MS vs Chickasha, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Iuka, MS vs Chickasha, OK.
| Data | Iuka | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,096 | 16,549 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $43,887 | $55,136 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Iuka vs Chickasha
- The population in Chickasha is higher at 16,549, compared to 3,096 in Iuka.
- Residents in Iuka have a higher median age of 37.2 years compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher median income of $55,136, compared to $43,887 in Iuka.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Iuka at 40.0% compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
- Iuka has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 17% in Chickasha.
- The unemployment rate in Iuka is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Iuka vs Chickasha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Iuka | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 6 |
| White | 94 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Iuka vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 4% in Iuka.
- Iuka has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 71% in Chickasha.
- Both Iuka and Chickasha have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Chickasha has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Iuka.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chickasha at 11%, compared to 2% in Iuka.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Iuka.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Iuka | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 25.7% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Iuka vs Chickasha
- More residents in Iuka report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 19.1% in Chickasha.
- Depression is more prevalent in Iuka at 26.4% compared to 25.4% in Chickasha.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Iuka at 25.7% compared to 21.8% in Chickasha.
- Binge drinking is more common in Iuka at 14.6% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 40.0% in Iuka.
- Disability percentages are higher in Iuka at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Chickasha.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Iuka | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (75) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 19.9% (616) | 22.5% (3,730) |
| Less than High School | 21.0% (650) | 13.1% (2,160) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.2% (348) | 12.5% (2,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Iuka vs Chickasha
- A higher percentage of residents in Iuka have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.5% in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 19.9% in Iuka.
- More residents in Iuka have less than a high school education at 21.0% compared to 13.1% in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 11.2% in Iuka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.