Demographics details for Ithaca, MI vs South jordan, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ithaca, MI vs South jordan, UT.
Data | Ithaca | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,808 | 83,513 |
Median Age | 42.2 years | 34.4 years |
Median Income | $60,389 | $119,822 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Ithaca vs South jordan
- The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 2,808 in Ithaca.
- Residents in Ithaca have a higher median age of 42.2 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $60,389 in Ithaca.
- In South jordan, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 39.0% in Ithaca.
- Ithaca has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- The unemployment rate in Ithaca is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.7% in South jordan.
Demographics
Demographics Ithaca vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ithaca | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 87 | 83 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | 8 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ithaca vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ithaca at 1% compared to 0% in South jordan.
- Ithaca has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 83% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Ithaca.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ithaca at 8% compared to 7% in South jordan.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South jordan at 5%, compared to 3% in Ithaca.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ithaca and South jordan at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ithaca | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 9.0% |
Depression | 27.0% | 26.5% |
Smoking | 21.2% | 7.3% |
Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 36.4% | 28.6% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ithaca vs South jordan
- More residents in Ithaca report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.7% in South jordan.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ithaca at 27.0% compared to 26.5% in South jordan.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ithaca at 21.2% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ithaca at 18.0% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ithaca at 36.4% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ithaca at 16.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ithaca | South jordan |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (43) | 0.2% (172) |
High School Diploma | 21.4% (602) | 8.4% (6,995) |
Less than High School | 13.1% (368) | 2.7% (2,236) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.6% (495) | 27.1% (22,648) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ithaca vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of residents in Ithaca have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ithaca hold a high school diploma at 21.4% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
- More residents in Ithaca have less than a high school education at 13.1% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 17.6% in Ithaca.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.