Demographics details for Iron river, WI vs Yuma, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Iron river, WI vs Yuma, AZ.

Data Iron river Yuma
Population 1,134 98,527
Median Age 42.0 years 32.0 years
Median Income $48,000 $59,312
Married Families 60.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 13% 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 9.0

Population Comparison: Iron river vs Yuma

  • The population in Yuma is higher at 98,527, compared to 1,134 in Iron river.
  • Residents in Iron river have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 32.0 years in Yuma.
  • Yuma has a higher median income of $59,312, compared to $48,000 in Iron river.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Iron river at 60.0% compared to 39.0% in Yuma.
  • The poverty level is higher in Yuma at 18%, compared to 13% in Iron river.
  • Yuma has a higher unemployment rate at 9.0% compared to 3.5% in Iron river.

Demographics

Demographics Iron river vs Yuma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Iron river Yuma
Black Data is updating 2
White 95 13
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 3 61
Two or More Races 1 21
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Iron river vs Yuma

  • In Yuma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Iron river.
  • Iron river has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 13% in Yuma.
  • In Yuma, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Iron river.
  • Yuma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 61%, compared to 3% in Iron river.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yuma at 21%, compared to 1% in Iron river.
  • In Yuma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Iron river.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Iron river Yuma
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 16.8%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 13.2%
Depression Data is updating% 19.3%
Smoking Data is updating% 16.2%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 17.6%
Obesity Data is updating% 39.5%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Iron river vs Yuma

  • In Yuma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 0.0% in Iron river.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Yuma at 19.3% versus 0.0% in Iron river.
  • Yuma has a higher smoking rate at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Iron river.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Yuma at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Iron river.
  • Yuma has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 0.0% in Iron river.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Yuma at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Iron river.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Iron river Yuma
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.7% (1,642)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 13.2% (13,054)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 19.8% (19,520)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.3% (12,116)

Education Levels Comparison: Iron river vs Yuma

  • In Yuma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Iron river.
  • In Yuma, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.2% compared to 0.0% in Iron river.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yuma at 19.8%, compared to 0.0% in Iron river.
  • In Yuma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.3% compared to 0.0% in Iron river.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.