Demographics details for Intercourse, PA vs Chesapeake, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Intercourse, PA vs Chesapeake, VA.
| Data | Intercourse | Chesapeake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,691 | 252,488 |
| Median Age | 32.8 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $98,571 | $92,703 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 1% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Intercourse vs Chesapeake
- The population in Chesapeake is higher at 252,488, compared to 1,691 in Intercourse.
- The median age in Chesapeake is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 32.8 years in Intercourse.
- Intercourse has a higher median income of $98,571 compared to $92,703 in Chesapeake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Intercourse at 44.0% compared to 43.0% in Chesapeake.
- The poverty level is higher in Chesapeake at 8%, compared to 1% in Intercourse.
- The unemployment rate in Intercourse is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.
Demographics
Demographics Intercourse vs Chesapeake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Intercourse | Chesapeake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 29 |
| White | 100 | 53 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 7 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Intercourse vs Chesapeake
- In Chesapeake, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 0% in Intercourse.
- Intercourse has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 53% in Chesapeake.
- In Chesapeake, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Intercourse.
- Chesapeake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Intercourse.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chesapeake at 7%, compared to 0% in Intercourse.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Intercourse and Chesapeake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Intercourse | Chesapeake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 23.2% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 35.4% | 36.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Intercourse vs Chesapeake
- More residents in Intercourse report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.9% in Chesapeake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Intercourse at 25.4% compared to 20.9% in Chesapeake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Intercourse at 23.2% compared to 14.8% in Chesapeake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Intercourse at 17.6% compared to 16.1% in Chesapeake.
- Chesapeake has higher obesity rates at 36.1% compared to 35.4% in Intercourse.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chesapeake at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Intercourse.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Intercourse | Chesapeake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (15) | 0.8% (2,039) |
| High School Diploma | 7.6% (128) | 13.1% (33,024) |
| Less than High School | 50.9% (860) | 7.0% (17,684) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.2% (173) | 23.8% (60,160) |
Education Levels Comparison: Intercourse vs Chesapeake
- A higher percentage of residents in Intercourse have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.8% in Chesapeake.
- In Chesapeake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.1% compared to 7.6% in Intercourse.
- More residents in Intercourse have less than a high school education at 50.9% compared to 7.0% in Chesapeake.
- In Chesapeake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 10.2% in Intercourse.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.