Demographics details for Inola, OK vs Orange, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Inola, OK vs Orange, CA.
| Data | Inola | Orange |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,897 | 136,178 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $57,679 | $109,335 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Inola vs Orange
- The population in Orange is higher at 136,178, compared to 1,897 in Inola.
- The median age in Orange is higher at 36.5 years, compared to 36.3 years in Inola.
- Orange has a higher median income of $109,335, compared to $57,679 in Inola.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Inola at 41.0% compared to 40.0% in Orange.
- Inola has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Orange.
- The unemployment rate in Inola is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.1% in Orange.
Demographics
Demographics Inola vs Orange provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Inola | Orange |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 71 | 29 |
| Asian | 1 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 40 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 14 |
| American Indian | 10 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Inola vs Orange
- In Orange, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Inola.
- Inola has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 29% in Orange.
- In Orange, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 1% in Inola.
- Orange has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 40%, compared to 4% in Inola.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Orange at 14%, compared to 13% in Inola.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Inola at 10% compared to 1% in Orange.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Inola | Orange |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 26.1% | 17.9% |
| Smoking | 21.2% | 10.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 45.0% | 27.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Inola vs Orange
- More residents in Inola report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 14.9% in Orange.
- Depression is more prevalent in Inola at 26.1% compared to 17.9% in Orange.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Inola at 21.2% compared to 10.5% in Orange.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Orange at 16.8% compared to 15.1% in Inola.
- Obesity rates are higher in Inola at 45.0% compared to 27.1% in Orange.
- Disability percentages are higher in Inola at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Orange.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Inola | Orange |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (4) | 1.8% (2,483) |
| High School Diploma | 20.1% (381) | 11.0% (14,986) |
| Less than High School | 11.0% (208) | 15.5% (21,174) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (208) | 28.2% (38,372) |
Education Levels Comparison: Inola vs Orange
- In Orange, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.2% in Inola.
- A higher percentage of residents in Inola hold a high school diploma at 20.1% compared to 11.0% in Orange.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Orange at 15.5%, compared to 11.0% in Inola.
- In Orange, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.2% compared to 11.0% in Inola.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.