Demographics details for Ingalls, MI vs Schenectady, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Ingalls, MI vs Schenectady, NY.

Data Ingalls Schenectady
Population 150 68,809
Median Age 35.0 years 36.0 years
Median Income $60,000 $54,650
Married Families 50.0% 28.0%
Poverty Level 10% 13%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 4.6

Population Comparison: Ingalls vs Schenectady

  • The population in Schenectady is higher at 68,809, compared to 150 in Ingalls.
  • The median age in Schenectady is higher at 36.0 years, compared to 35.0 years in Ingalls.
  • Ingalls has a higher median income of $60,000 compared to $54,650 in Schenectady.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Ingalls at 50.0% compared to 28.0% in Schenectady.
  • The poverty level is higher in Schenectady at 13%, compared to 10% in Ingalls.
  • The unemployment rate in Ingalls is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.6% in Schenectady.

Demographics

Demographics Ingalls vs Schenectady provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Ingalls Schenectady
Black Data is updating 20
White 90 47
Asian 5 7
Hispanic Data is updating 12
Two or More Races 5 13
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Ingalls vs Schenectady

  • In Schenectady, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 0% in Ingalls.
  • Ingalls has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 47% in Schenectady.
  • In Schenectady, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 5% in Ingalls.
  • Schenectady has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 0% in Ingalls.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Schenectady at 13%, compared to 5% in Ingalls.
  • In Schenectady, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ingalls.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Ingalls Schenectady
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 12.5%
Depression Data is updating% 24.0%
Smoking Data is updating% 22.7%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 16.2%
Obesity Data is updating% 39.6%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Ingalls vs Schenectady

  • In Schenectady, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Schenectady at 24.0% versus 0.0% in Ingalls.
  • Schenectady has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Schenectady at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
  • Schenectady has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Schenectady at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Ingalls Schenectady
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.7% (1,194)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 15.3% (10,540)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 14.7% (10,146)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 15.0% (10,303)

Education Levels Comparison: Ingalls vs Schenectady

  • In Schenectady, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
  • In Schenectady, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Schenectady at 14.7%, compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.
  • In Schenectady, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Ingalls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.