Demographics details for Hutchinson, KS vs Sterling heights, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Hutchinson, KS vs Sterling heights, MI.

Data Hutchinson Sterling heights
Population 39,699 132,567
Median Age 38.4 years 41.2 years
Median Income $55,265 $75,381
Married Families 36.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 10% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 4.7

Population Comparison: Hutchinson vs Sterling heights

  • The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 39,699 in Hutchinson.
  • The median age in Sterling heights is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 38.4 years in Hutchinson.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381, compared to $55,265 in Hutchinson.
  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 36.0% in Hutchinson.
  • Hutchinson has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.0% in Hutchinson.

Demographics

Demographics Hutchinson vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Hutchinson Sterling heights
Black 3 6
White 74 79
Asian 1 9
Hispanic 13 2
Two or More Races 8 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Hutchinson vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 3% in Hutchinson.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling heights at 79% compared to 74% in Hutchinson.
  • In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 1% in Hutchinson.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Hutchinson at 13% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Hutchinson at 8% compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hutchinson at 1% compared to 0% in Sterling heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Hutchinson Sterling heights
Mental Health Not Good 16.8% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% 11.4%
Depression 25.0% 25.5%
Smoking 20.3% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 17.7%
Obesity 42.4% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Hutchinson vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.8% in Hutchinson.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling heights at 25.5% versus 25.0% in Hutchinson.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Hutchinson at 20.3% compared to 19.8% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 17.0% in Hutchinson.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Hutchinson at 42.4% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Hutchinson at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Sterling heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Hutchinson Sterling heights
No Schooling 0.2% (75) 2.4% (3,134)
High School Diploma 16.0% (6,363) 18.8% (24,937)
Less than High School 10.6% (4,195) 16.6% (22,008)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.0% (5,559) 22.3% (29,518)

Education Levels Comparison: Hutchinson vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.2% in Hutchinson.
  • In Sterling heights, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 16.0% in Hutchinson.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling heights at 16.6%, compared to 10.6% in Hutchinson.
  • In Sterling heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 14.0% in Hutchinson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.