Demographics details for Hull, MA vs Central city, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hull, MA vs Central city, KY.
| Data | Hull | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,116 | 5,810 |
| Median Age | 54.2 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $128,022 | $52,184 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hull vs Central city
- In Hull, the population is higher at 10,116, compared to 5,810 in Central city.
- Residents in Hull have a higher median age of 54.2 years compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
- Hull has a higher median income of $128,022 compared to $52,184 in Central city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hull at 44.0% compared to 38.0% in Central city.
- The poverty level is higher in Central city at 16%, compared to 4% in Hull.
- The unemployment rate in Hull is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics Hull vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hull | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 95 | 88 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hull vs Central city
- In Central city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Hull.
- Hull has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 88% in Central city.
- The Asian population is larger in Hull at 2% compared to 0% in Central city.
- Central city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Hull.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central city at 6%, compared to 2% in Hull.
- In Central city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hull.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hull | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 26.8% |
| Smoking | 12.3% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 26.8% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hull vs Central city
- In Central city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 14.9% in Hull.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 26.8% versus 22.2% in Hull.
- Central city has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 12.3% in Hull.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hull at 19.7% compared to 14.8% in Central city.
- Central city has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 26.8% in Hull.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central city at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Hull.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hull | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (18) | 1.1% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (1,503) | 15.4% (897) |
| Less than High School | 3.5% (353) | 15.6% (905) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.0% (4,244) | 8.3% (480) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hull vs Central city
- In Central city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.2% in Hull.
- In Central city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.4% compared to 14.9% in Hull.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central city at 15.6%, compared to 3.5% in Hull.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hull hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.0% compared to 8.3% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.