Demographics details for Hoyt, KS vs Mount juliet, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hoyt, KS vs Mount juliet, TN.
| Data | Hoyt | Mount juliet |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 589 | 42,548 |
| Median Age | 40.0 years | 39.2 years |
| Median Income | $73,750 | $108,066 |
| Married Families | 56.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 2.8 |
Population Comparison: Hoyt vs Mount juliet
- The population in Mount juliet is higher at 42,548, compared to 589 in Hoyt.
- Residents in Hoyt have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 39.2 years in Mount juliet.
- Mount juliet has a higher median income of $108,066, compared to $73,750 in Hoyt.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hoyt at 56.0% compared to 45.0% in Mount juliet.
- Hoyt has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 5% in Mount juliet.
- The unemployment rate in Hoyt is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.8% in Mount juliet.
Demographics
Demographics Hoyt vs Mount juliet provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hoyt | Mount juliet |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 7 |
| White | 86 | 79 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hoyt vs Mount juliet
- In Mount juliet, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 0% in Hoyt.
- Hoyt has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 79% in Mount juliet.
- In Mount juliet, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Hoyt.
- Mount juliet has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Hoyt.
- Both Hoyt and Mount juliet have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hoyt at 4% compared to 0% in Mount juliet.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hoyt | Mount juliet |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 29.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hoyt vs Mount juliet
- In Mount juliet, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.8% in Hoyt.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mount juliet at 25.7% versus 22.2% in Hoyt.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hoyt at 17.7% compared to 15.2% in Mount juliet.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hoyt at 19.0% compared to 16.8% in Mount juliet.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hoyt at 39.5% compared to 29.9% in Mount juliet.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hoyt at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Mount juliet.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hoyt | Mount juliet |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (3) | 0.4% (173) |
| High School Diploma | 26.1% (154) | 10.4% (4,408) |
| Less than High School | 12.6% (74) | 3.9% (1,653) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (100) | 29.4% (12,510) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hoyt vs Mount juliet
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoyt have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Mount juliet.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoyt hold a high school diploma at 26.1% compared to 10.4% in Mount juliet.
- More residents in Hoyt have less than a high school education at 12.6% compared to 3.9% in Mount juliet.
- In Mount juliet, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 17.0% in Hoyt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.