Demographics details for Hospers, IA vs Fairborn, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hospers, IA vs Fairborn, OH.
Data | Hospers | Fairborn |
---|---|---|
Population | 710 | 34,977 |
Median Age | 29.8 years | 35.1 years |
Median Income | $69,659 | $53,783 |
Married Families | 57.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Hospers vs Fairborn
- The population in Fairborn is higher at 34,977, compared to 710 in Hospers.
- The median age in Fairborn is higher at 35.1 years, compared to 29.8 years in Hospers.
- Hospers has a higher median income of $69,659 compared to $53,783 in Fairborn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hospers at 57.0% compared to 33.0% in Fairborn.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairborn at 9%, compared to 6% in Hospers.
- Fairborn has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.2% in Hospers.
Demographics
Demographics Hospers vs Fairborn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hospers | Fairborn |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 9 |
White | 70 | 78 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 26 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hospers vs Fairborn
- In Fairborn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Hospers.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairborn at 78% compared to 70% in Hospers.
- In Fairborn, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Hospers.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hospers at 26% compared to 4% in Fairborn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairborn at 8%, compared to 3% in Hospers.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hospers at 1% compared to 0% in Fairborn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hospers | Fairborn |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 12.4% |
Depression | 16.6% | 23.4% |
Smoking | 15.2% | 20.5% |
Binge Drinking | 21.6% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 38.1% | 39.7% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hospers vs Fairborn
- In Fairborn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 14.2% in Hospers.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairborn at 23.4% versus 16.6% in Hospers.
- Fairborn has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 15.2% in Hospers.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hospers at 21.6% compared to 16.3% in Fairborn.
- Fairborn has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 38.1% in Hospers.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairborn at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Hospers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hospers | Fairborn |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (2) | 0.3% (116) |
High School Diploma | 26.6% (189) | 13.2% (4,620) |
Less than High School | 14.4% (102) | 12.5% (4,382) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (80) | 19.4% (6,782) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hospers vs Fairborn
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Hospers and Fairborn at 0.3%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hospers hold a high school diploma at 26.6% compared to 13.2% in Fairborn.
- More residents in Hospers have less than a high school education at 14.4% compared to 12.5% in Fairborn.
- In Fairborn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 11.3% in Hospers.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.