Demographics details for Hopatcong, NJ vs Falls church, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hopatcong, NJ vs Falls church, VA.
| Data | Hopatcong | Falls church |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,531 | 14,586 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $107,670 | $164,536 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Hopatcong vs Falls church
- The population in Falls church is higher at 14,586, compared to 14,531 in Hopatcong.
- Residents in Hopatcong have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 38.8 years in Falls church.
- Falls church has a higher median income of $164,536, compared to $107,670 in Hopatcong.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hopatcong at 46.0% compared to 43.0% in Falls church.
- The poverty level is higher in Falls church at 6%, compared to 4% in Hopatcong.
- The unemployment rate in Hopatcong is higher at 5.1%, compared to 2.5% in Falls church.
Demographics
Demographics Hopatcong vs Falls church provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hopatcong | Falls church |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 5 |
| White | 69 | 65 |
| Asian | 3 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hopatcong vs Falls church
- In Falls church, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Hopatcong.
- Hopatcong has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 65% in Falls church.
- In Falls church, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 3% in Hopatcong.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hopatcong at 17% compared to 11% in Falls church.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Falls church at 10%, compared to 8% in Hopatcong.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hopatcong and Falls church at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hopatcong | Falls church |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 11.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 6.5% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 13.1% | 7.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.6% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 32.1% | 30.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hopatcong vs Falls church
- More residents in Hopatcong report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 11.9% in Falls church.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hopatcong at 21.5% compared to 19.9% in Falls church.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hopatcong at 13.1% compared to 7.5% in Falls church.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hopatcong at 20.6% compared to 18.8% in Falls church.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hopatcong at 32.1% compared to 30.8% in Falls church.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hopatcong at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Falls church.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hopatcong | Falls church |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (71) | 0.3% (50) |
| High School Diploma | 20.8% (3,023) | 4.1% (597) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (831) | 2.7% (388) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.0% (3,779) | 52.5% (7,660) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hopatcong vs Falls church
- A higher percentage of residents in Hopatcong have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Falls church.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hopatcong hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 4.1% in Falls church.
- More residents in Hopatcong have less than a high school education at 5.7% compared to 2.7% in Falls church.
- In Falls church, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.5% compared to 26.0% in Hopatcong.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.