Demographics details for Hoover, AL vs Chickasha, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hoover, AL vs Chickasha, OK.
| Data | Hoover | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 92,435 | 16,549 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $101,765 | $55,136 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Hoover vs Chickasha
- In Hoover, the population is higher at 92,435, compared to 16,549 in Chickasha.
- Residents in Hoover have a higher median age of 38.3 years compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Hoover has a higher median income of $101,765 compared to $55,136 in Chickasha.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hoover at 46.0% compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
- The poverty level is higher in Chickasha at 17%, compared to 7% in Hoover.
- Chickasha has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.2% in Hoover.
Demographics
Demographics Hoover vs Chickasha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hoover | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 20 | 6 |
| White | 67 | 71 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Hoover vs Chickasha
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hoover at 20% compared to 6% in Chickasha.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chickasha at 71% compared to 67% in Hoover.
- The Asian population is larger in Hoover at 5% compared to 0% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 5% in Hoover.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chickasha at 11%, compared to 3% in Hoover.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Hoover.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hoover | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 11.0% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 32.1% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hoover vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 14.9% in Hoover.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chickasha at 25.4% versus 21.3% in Hoover.
- Chickasha has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 11.0% in Hoover.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hoover at 16.7% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 32.1% in Hoover.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chickasha at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Hoover.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hoover | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (583) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 7.3% (6,787) | 22.5% (3,730) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (3,478) | 13.1% (2,160) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.1% (38,000) | 12.5% (2,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hoover vs Chickasha
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoover have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Chickasha.
- In Chickasha, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 7.3% in Hoover.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chickasha at 13.1%, compared to 3.8% in Hoover.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoover hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.1% compared to 12.5% in Chickasha.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.