Demographics details for Honesdale, PA vs Antlers, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Honesdale, PA vs Antlers, OK.

Data Honesdale Antlers
Population 4,469 2,198
Median Age 42.5 years 36.7 years
Median Income $34,700 $27,798
Married Families 26.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 15% 18%
Unemployment Rate 6.7 4.5

Population Comparison: Honesdale vs Antlers

  • In Honesdale, the population is higher at 4,469, compared to 2,198 in Antlers.
  • Residents in Honesdale have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 36.7 years in Antlers.
  • Honesdale has a higher median income of $34,700 compared to $27,798 in Antlers.
  • In Antlers, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 26.0% in Honesdale.
  • The poverty level is higher in Antlers at 18%, compared to 15% in Honesdale.
  • The unemployment rate in Honesdale is higher at 6.7%, compared to 4.5% in Antlers.

Demographics

Demographics Honesdale vs Antlers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Honesdale Antlers
Black Data is updating 3
White 91 63
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 4 5
Two or More Races 4 15
American Indian Data is updating 13

Demographics Comparison: Honesdale vs Antlers

  • In Antlers, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Honesdale.
  • Honesdale has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 63% in Antlers.
  • Both Honesdale and Antlers have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Antlers has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Honesdale.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Antlers at 15%, compared to 4% in Honesdale.
  • In Antlers, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 13%, compared to 0% in Honesdale.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Honesdale Antlers
Mental Health Not Good 19.5% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good 14.0% 15.6%
Depression 25.5% 28.5%
Smoking 23.7% 26.4%
Binge Drinking 17.2% 14.1%
Obesity 36.4% 40.5%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 36.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Honesdale vs Antlers

  • In Antlers, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 19.5% in Honesdale.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Antlers at 28.5% versus 25.5% in Honesdale.
  • Antlers has a higher smoking rate at 26.4% compared to 23.7% in Honesdale.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Honesdale at 17.2% compared to 14.1% in Antlers.
  • Antlers has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 36.4% in Honesdale.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Antlers at 36.0% compared to 20.0% in Honesdale.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Honesdale Antlers
No Schooling 0.9% (41) 1.0% (23)
High School Diploma 27.6% (1,235) 23.4% (515)
Less than High School 17.1% (766) 26.2% (575)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.1% (676) 10.7% (236)

Education Levels Comparison: Honesdale vs Antlers

  • In Antlers, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Honesdale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Honesdale hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 23.4% in Antlers.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Antlers at 26.2%, compared to 17.1% in Honesdale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Honesdale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.1% compared to 10.7% in Antlers.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.