Demographics details for Holly, MI vs Central point, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Holly, MI vs Central point, OR.
Data | Holly | Central point |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,927 | 19,222 |
Median Age | 44.2 years | 40.3 years |
Median Income | $58,957 | $79,731 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Holly vs Central point
- The population in Central point is higher at 19,222, compared to 5,927 in Holly.
- Residents in Holly have a higher median age of 44.2 years compared to 40.3 years in Central point.
- Central point has a higher median income of $79,731, compared to $58,957 in Holly.
- In Central point, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 40.0% in Holly.
- The poverty level is higher in Central point at 10%, compared to 8% in Holly.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Holly and Central point at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Holly vs Central point provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Holly | Central point |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 91 | 76 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 3 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Holly vs Central point
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Holly and Central point at 0%.
- Holly has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 76% in Central point.
- In Central point, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Holly.
- Central point has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 3% in Holly.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central point at 7%, compared to 6% in Holly.
- In Central point, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Holly.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Holly | Central point |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 19.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 12.0% |
Depression | 23.8% | 29.4% |
Smoking | 17.9% | 16.7% |
Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 30.1% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Holly vs Central point
- In Central point, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.3% in Holly.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central point at 29.4% versus 23.8% in Holly.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Holly at 17.9% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
- Binge drinking is more common in Holly at 18.7% compared to 16.5% in Central point.
- Obesity rates are higher in Holly at 32.9% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
- Disability percentages are higher in Holly at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Holly | Central point |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (31) | 1.7% (319) |
High School Diploma | 17.5% (1,038) | 16.1% (3,095) |
Less than High School | 13.4% (792) | 13.2% (2,530) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (1,017) | 15.6% (3,003) |
Education Levels Comparison: Holly vs Central point
- In Central point, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.5% in Holly.
- A higher percentage of residents in Holly hold a high school diploma at 17.5% compared to 16.1% in Central point.
- More residents in Holly have less than a high school education at 13.4% compared to 13.2% in Central point.
- A higher percentage of residents in Holly hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 15.6% in Central point.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.