Demographics details for Hollister, NC vs Union city, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hollister, NC vs Union city, GA.
Data | Hollister | Union city |
---|---|---|
Population | 847 | 27,895 |
Median Age | 34.3 years | 32.7 years |
Median Income | $39,913 | $46,696 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 17.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Hollister vs Union city
- The population in Union city is higher at 27,895, compared to 847 in Hollister.
- Residents in Hollister have a higher median age of 34.3 years compared to 32.7 years in Union city.
- Union city has a higher median income of $46,696, compared to $39,913 in Hollister.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hollister at 40.0% compared to 17.0% in Union city.
- Hollister has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 16% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 4.5% in Hollister.
Demographics
Demographics Hollister vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hollister | Union city |
---|---|---|
Black | 16 | 85 |
White | 21 | 6 |
Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 4 |
American Indian | 41 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hollister vs Union city
- In Union city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 85% compared to 16% in Hollister.
- Hollister has a higher percentage of White residents at 21% compared to 6% in Union city.
- The Asian population is larger in Hollister at 5% compared to 0% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Hollister.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hollister at 13% compared to 4% in Union city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hollister at 41% compared to 0% in Union city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hollister | Union city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.8% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 18.1% | 12.2% |
Depression | 24.6% | 17.2% |
Smoking | 31.3% | 18.0% |
Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 13.5% |
Obesity | 44.9% | 36.6% |
Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hollister vs Union city
- More residents in Hollister report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 16.7% in Union city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hollister at 24.6% compared to 17.2% in Union city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hollister at 31.3% compared to 18.0% in Union city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hollister at 14.9% compared to 13.5% in Union city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hollister at 44.9% compared to 36.6% in Union city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hollister at 25.0% compared to 12.0% in Union city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hollister | Union city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.9% (33) | 0.5% (129) |
High School Diploma | 21.0% (178) | 13.2% (3,681) |
Less than High School | 12.3% (104) | 7.8% (2,166) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.7% (91) | 17.3% (4,828) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hollister vs Union city
- A higher percentage of residents in Hollister have no formal schooling at 3.9% compared to 0.5% in Union city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hollister hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 13.2% in Union city.
- More residents in Hollister have less than a high school education at 12.3% compared to 7.8% in Union city.
- In Union city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 10.7% in Hollister.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.