Demographics details for Holdenville, OK vs Chicago, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Holdenville, OK vs Chicago, IL.
| Data | Holdenville | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,916 | 2,665,039 |
| Median Age | 36.1 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $38,232 | $71,673 |
| Married Families | 22.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 7.1 |
Population Comparison: Holdenville vs Chicago
- The population in Chicago is higher at 2,665,039, compared to 5,916 in Holdenville.
- Residents in Holdenville have a higher median age of 36.1 years compared to 35.3 years in Chicago.
- Chicago has a higher median income of $71,673, compared to $38,232 in Holdenville.
- In Chicago, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 22.0% in Holdenville.
- Holdenville has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 18% in Chicago.
- Chicago has a higher unemployment rate at 7.1% compared to 4.5% in Holdenville.
Demographics
Demographics Holdenville vs Chicago provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Holdenville | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 29 |
| White | 55 | 23 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 10 |
| American Indian | 20 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Holdenville vs Chicago
- In Chicago, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 7% in Holdenville.
- Holdenville has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 23% in Chicago.
- In Chicago, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Holdenville.
- Chicago has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 9% in Holdenville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chicago at 10%, compared to 8% in Holdenville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Holdenville at 20% compared to 1% in Chicago.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Holdenville | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.6% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.2% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 16.3% |
| Smoking | 27.5% | 15.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 43.3% | 34.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Holdenville vs Chicago
- More residents in Holdenville report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 14.5% in Chicago.
- Depression is more prevalent in Holdenville at 24.6% compared to 16.3% in Chicago.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Holdenville at 27.5% compared to 15.1% in Chicago.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chicago at 16.5% compared to 14.4% in Holdenville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Holdenville at 43.3% compared to 34.1% in Chicago.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Holdenville and Chicago at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Holdenville | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (67) | 1.7% (44,697) |
| High School Diploma | 23.1% (1,369) | 13.3% (354,780) |
| Less than High School | 24.9% (1,471) | 15.8% (419,784) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (415) | 30.4% (811,024) |
Education Levels Comparison: Holdenville vs Chicago
- In Chicago, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.1% in Holdenville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Holdenville hold a high school diploma at 23.1% compared to 13.3% in Chicago.
- More residents in Holdenville have less than a high school education at 24.9% compared to 15.8% in Chicago.
- In Chicago, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 7.0% in Holdenville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.