Demographics details for Hoboken, GA vs Central city, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hoboken, GA vs Central city, KY.
Data | Hoboken | Central city |
---|---|---|
Population | 481 | 5,810 |
Median Age | 38.7 years | 33.5 years |
Median Income | $71,154 | $52,184 |
Married Families | 71.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hoboken vs Central city
- The population in Central city is higher at 5,810, compared to 481 in Hoboken.
- Residents in Hoboken have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
- Hoboken has a higher median income of $71,154 compared to $52,184 in Central city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hoboken at 71.0% compared to 38.0% in Central city.
- The poverty level is higher in Central city at 16%, compared to 14% in Hoboken.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Hoboken and Central city at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Hoboken vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hoboken | Central city |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 3 |
White | 93 | 88 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hoboken vs Central city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hoboken at 7% compared to 3% in Central city.
- Hoboken has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 88% in Central city.
- Both Hoboken and Central city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Central city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Hoboken.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central city at 6%, compared to 0% in Hoboken.
- In Central city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hoboken.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hoboken | Central city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 15.5% |
Depression | 25.1% | 26.8% |
Smoking | 23.7% | 24.8% |
Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 40.4% | 41.9% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hoboken vs Central city
- More residents in Hoboken report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 19.3% in Central city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 26.8% versus 25.1% in Hoboken.
- Central city has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 23.7% in Hoboken.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hoboken at 15.3% compared to 14.8% in Central city.
- Central city has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 40.4% in Hoboken.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central city at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Hoboken.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hoboken | Central city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (65) |
High School Diploma | 48.9% (235) | 15.4% (897) |
Less than High School | 20.6% (99) | 15.6% (905) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 4.8% (23) | 8.3% (480) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hoboken vs Central city
- In Central city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Hoboken.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoboken hold a high school diploma at 48.9% compared to 15.4% in Central city.
- More residents in Hoboken have less than a high school education at 20.6% compared to 15.6% in Central city.
- In Central city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.3% compared to 4.8% in Hoboken.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.