Demographics details for Hickory, NC vs Lancaster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hickory, NC vs Lancaster, CA.
| Data | Hickory | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 44,084 | 169,185 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $58,251 | $71,367 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Hickory vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 169,185, compared to 44,084 in Hickory.
- Residents in Hickory have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $71,367, compared to $58,251 in Hickory.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hickory at 35.0% compared to 32.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 15%, compared to 12% in Hickory.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 4.3% in Hickory.
Demographics
Demographics Hickory vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hickory | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 13 | 21 |
| White | 62 | 10 |
| Asian | 4 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hickory vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 13% in Hickory.
- Hickory has a higher percentage of White residents at 62% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- Both Hickory and Lancaster have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 13% in Hickory.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 18%, compared to 7% in Hickory.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hickory and Lancaster at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hickory | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 18.1% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hickory vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.1% in Hickory.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hickory at 24.8% compared to 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hickory at 18.1% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hickory at 17.2% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hickory at 37.7% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hickory at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hickory | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (306) | 2.0% (3,403) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (5,797) | 17.5% (29,555) |
| Less than High School | 11.4% (5,022) | 21.5% (36,421) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.0% (10,580) | 12.3% (20,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hickory vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.7% in Hickory.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.5% compared to 13.1% in Hickory.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 21.5%, compared to 11.4% in Hickory.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hickory hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.0% compared to 12.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.