Demographics details for Heppner, OR vs Zanesville, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Heppner, OR vs Zanesville, OH.
| Data | Heppner | Zanesville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,172 | 24,600 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $46,708 | $40,927 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Heppner vs Zanesville
- The population in Zanesville is higher at 24,600, compared to 1,172 in Heppner.
- Residents in Heppner have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 38.1 years in Zanesville.
- Heppner has a higher median income of $46,708 compared to $40,927 in Zanesville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Heppner at 43.0% compared to 25.0% in Zanesville.
- The poverty level is higher in Zanesville at 11%, compared to 10% in Heppner.
- Zanesville has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 5.7% in Heppner.
Demographics
Demographics Heppner vs Zanesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Heppner | Zanesville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 9 |
| White | 86 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Heppner vs Zanesville
- In Zanesville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Heppner.
- Heppner has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 79% in Zanesville.
- In Zanesville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Heppner.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Heppner at 6% compared to 3% in Zanesville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Zanesville at 8%, compared to 7% in Heppner.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Heppner and Zanesville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Heppner | Zanesville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 27.6% | 26.7% |
| Smoking | 16.2% | 25.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 47.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 35.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Heppner vs Zanesville
- In Zanesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 18.5% in Heppner.
- Depression is more prevalent in Heppner at 27.6% compared to 26.7% in Zanesville.
- Zanesville has a higher smoking rate at 25.8% compared to 16.2% in Heppner.
- Binge drinking is more common in Heppner at 18.2% compared to 16.6% in Zanesville.
- Zanesville has higher obesity rates at 47.8% compared to 34.4% in Heppner.
- Disability percentages are higher in Heppner at 35.0% compared to 19.0% in Zanesville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Heppner | Zanesville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.6% (389) |
| High School Diploma | 22.0% (258) | 26.5% (6,510) |
| Less than High School | 9.4% (110) | 17.8% (4,373) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.8% (115) | 9.0% (2,214) |
Education Levels Comparison: Heppner vs Zanesville
- In Zanesville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Heppner.
- In Zanesville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.5% compared to 22.0% in Heppner.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Zanesville at 17.8%, compared to 9.4% in Heppner.
- A higher percentage of residents in Heppner hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.8% compared to 9.0% in Zanesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.