Demographics details for Heathsville, VA vs Clayton, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Heathsville, VA vs Clayton, NC.
| Data | Heathsville | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 126 | 29,445 |
| Median Age | 34.0 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $109,750 | $71,698 |
| Married Families | 66.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Heathsville vs Clayton
- The population in Clayton is higher at 29,445, compared to 126 in Heathsville.
- Residents in Heathsville have a higher median age of 34.0 years compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
- Heathsville has a higher median income of $109,750 compared to $71,698 in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Heathsville at 66.0% compared to 35.0% in Clayton.
- The poverty level is identical in both Heathsville and Clayton at 5%.
- Clayton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.1% in Heathsville.
Demographics
Demographics Heathsville vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Heathsville | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 22 |
| White | 83 | 59 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Heathsville vs Clayton
- In Clayton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 0% in Heathsville.
- Heathsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 59% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Heathsville.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 0% in Heathsville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Heathsville at 17% compared to 5% in Clayton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Heathsville and Clayton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Heathsville | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 38.6% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Heathsville vs Clayton
- More residents in Heathsville report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.6% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 23.1% versus 22.9% in Heathsville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Heathsville at 18.6% compared to 15.2% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Heathsville at 17.7% compared to 17.6% in Clayton.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 38.6% in Heathsville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Heathsville at 30.0% compared to 10.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Heathsville | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (210) |
| High School Diploma | 22.2% (28) | 12.6% (3,700) |
| Less than High School | 15.9% (20) | 5.4% (1,598) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (21) | 18.6% (5,471) |
Education Levels Comparison: Heathsville vs Clayton
- In Clayton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Heathsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Heathsville hold a high school diploma at 22.2% compared to 12.6% in Clayton.
- More residents in Heathsville have less than a high school education at 15.9% compared to 5.4% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 16.7% in Heathsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.